The Jerusalem Post, on Iran, 9 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Trump says Saudi Arabia, Qatar want peaceful resolution to Iran war, US ready to strike if needed

Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding

US President Donald Trump told Reuters in a brief phone interview on Monday that Qatar and Saudi Arabia are eager for a peaceful solution to the Iran conflict, but the US is ready to resume military strikes if necessary.Trump, who met Qatar's prime minister earlier on Monday, said "Qatar would rather see a peaceful solution" and "Saudi Arabia would rather see a peaceful solution," but "we're ready to go anytime we want" with strikes.Trump, though, signaled he was in no rush to resume strikes, saying he was content with the US naval blockade against Iran in the Strait of Hormuz."We'll see where it goes," he said in a brief phone interview.

"I'm prepared."In a Truth Social post, Trump said he "had an excellent conversation with Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani.""Most importantly, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait, and others, would prefer the status quo, in other words, a continuation of the Greatest Naval Blockade in History, and the new Operation Iron Gate — Therefore, Land and Sea. All have agreed that Iran cannot have a Nuclear Weapon — That is non-negotiable!" he continued.

The US president added that at this point, Israel and the Middle East are protected from "Iranian danger and threats."Qatar PM says discussions with Trump, Vance were positiveQatar Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani said following the meeting that discussions with Trump and Vance were positive. "Grateful for the positive discussions on reaching a deal and bringing peace to the region," he said in a post on X/Twitter.It was great meeting with President @realDonaldTrump and Vice President @VP in Washington.

We discussed the situation in the region and ways to progress the US-Iran talks. Grateful for the positive discussions on reaching a deal and bringing peace to the region.— محمد بن عبدالرحمن (@MBA_AlThani_) November 9, 2026Iran's top security official says US should stop manufacturing 'fake news about imaginary talks'In response, Iranian security council chief Mohsen Rezaei said in a post on X on Monday that the US should "stop manufacturing fake news about imaginary talks" and that it was "time to surrender to the seven conditions Iran has repeatedly set out.""

The war on Iran has already wrecked the US government," he said. "But Washington flails like a desperate gambler. FOLD YOUR HAND."He also said it was time to "stop denying the West Asian NEW ORDER."The war on Iran has already wrecked the US government. But Washington flails like a desperate gambler. FOLD YOUR HAND. STOP manufacturing FAKE NEWS about imaginary talks. Stop denying the West Asian NEW ORDER. Time to SURRENDER to the seven conditions Iran has repeatedly set out.— محسن رضایی (@ir_rezaee) November 9, 2026Rezaei had alleged late last month that Iran was debating whether to maintain its longstanding ban on nuclear weapons in the event that US hostilities resume, adding that the nuclear issue can only be discussed once the US meets Iran's demands.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article gives Iran's response only through Rezaei's post dismissing 'imaginary talks'. It leaves out that President Masoud Pezeshkian said the same day that Iran was open to further negotiations but would not be coerced. Without it a reader may take Iran's position as a flat rejection of talks.

How we know

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Jerusalem Post runs a Reuters report of Trump's remarks after meeting Qatar's prime minister, with his claims about Gulf states and the nuclear issue kept in his own words and an Iranian reply from Mohsen Rezaei. Nothing in it misleads the reader in a way that changes the event. The only gap is that it carries Rezaei's taunt as Iran's whole response and leaves out President Pezeshkian's same-day statement that Iran was open to further negotiations.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article gives Iran's response only through Rezaei's post dismissing 'imaginary talks'. It leaves out that President Masoud Pezeshkian said the same day that Iran was open to further negotiations but would not be coerced. Without it a reader may take Iran's position as a flat rejection of talks.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “US President Donald Trump told Reuters in a brief phone interview on Monday that Qatar and Saudi Arabia are eager for a peaceful solution”

    The report pins the account of Gulf states' wishes to Trump as his claim, not the outlet's fact.

  • “In response, Iranian security council chief Mohsen Rezaei said in a post on X on Monday”

    The article gives Iran's side a named voice and space rather than leaving Trump's claims unanswered.

  • “Iran was debating whether to maintain its longstanding ban on nuclear weapons”

    The article reports Iran's standing ban on nuclear weapons and attributes the talk of revisiting it to Rezaei, rather than presupposing a weapons programme.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 10 NovTrump says further military action against Iran ‘doesn’t seem necessary,’ reveals Tehran is talking0.0
  2. 9 NovIran defends two-day peace proposal as 'most reasonable,' slamming Rubio's remarks as unjustified3.0
  3. 9 NovTrump to meet Qatar's prime minister as Iran diplomacy faces hurdles3.0
  4. 9 Nov'Iranian demands are outrageous,' Rubio says as talks fail to make progress3.0
  5. 8 NovThe US wants to cut off Iran’s access to weapons via its land borders, will this work? - analysis3.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post

See how 50 outlets covered this story