Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on Lebanon, 3 November 2026

9.1out of 10Severe

in eight months

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

Troops from the IDF's 7th Brigade Combat Team have , during which they and destroyed around 3,500 terrorist infrastructure sites belonging to the organization. Throughout the operation, brigade forces targeted the terrorist networks established by Hezbollah in southern Lebanon, focusing on destroying operational infrastructure, locating weapons, and .

One of the main objectives was the destruction of Hezbollah's underground infrastructure, including complexes known as "refuge cities." According to the IDF, these facilities formed part of an underground infrastructure network established by Hezbollah with financial support from the Iranian regime. The complexes were destroyed by troops from the 7th Brigade in cooperation with soldiers from the Yahalom Unit, which specializes in special engineering operations, including missions targeting underground infrastructure.

Alongside operations against these complexes, throughout the brigade's areas of operation. According to IDF figures, during the eight months of operations, while soldiers conducting searches discovered hundreds of weapons belonging to the organization.

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

Israel National News relays an Israeli army tally of one brigade's eight months in southern Lebanon almost entirely in the army's own language. It writes about 400 deaths as people being "eliminated" and labels all of them "terrorists" in its own voice. It also calls 3,500 destroyed sites "terrorist" sites in the headline with no attribution, and presents an invasion and occupation as "operational activity".

  1. Writes the death out

    Severe

    “eliminated approximately 400 Hezbollah terrorists”

    Why this matters
    The outlet uses "eliminated" in its own voice for the deaths of about 400 people, in the opening sentence and with no source.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes in a clean, technical result of an operation rather than about 400 people killed by Israeli occupation forces.
    The context
    These are killings carried out by Israeli troops during an invasion of southern Lebanon. The word kill does not appear anywhere in the article.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “killed”.
    • On the recordIsrael invaded southern Lebanon and bombarded Beirut and other areas.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “eliminating Hezbollah operatives”

    Why this matters
    The outlet lists "eliminating Hezbollah operatives" as one task alongside "locating weapons", so killing people reads as part of an engineering checklist.
    The impression it gives
    A reader sees the killing of people as routine operational work of the same kind as finding weapons or destroying tunnels.
    The context
    Killing people is not equivalent to destroying infrastructure. The article never says anyone was killed.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “killed”.

    Show it in the article

    “approximately 400 Hezbollah terrorists were eliminated”

    Why this matters
    Even where it cites the army, the outlet keeps "were eliminated" in the passive voice. This removes both the death and the troops who caused it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader closes the article with a figure for people "eliminated" and no sense that 400 people were killed by Israeli forces.
    The context
    Israeli troops killed these people. The article ends without ever saying so.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “killed”.

    Show it in the article

  2. Labels people on one side's word

    Severe

    “400 Hezbollah terrorists”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice, with no attribution, the outlet calls all 400 people killed "Hezbollah terrorists".
    The impression it gives
    A reader accepts as established fact that every one of the 400 dead was a Hezbollah fighter.
    The context
    The only source the article gives for the figure and the identity of the dead is the Israeli army itself, and it gives that source only later. No Lebanese or independent source is cited. Lebanese Health Ministry figures for the same period include hundreds of women and children killed by Israel.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“According to IDF figures”
    • On the recordAl Jazeera, citing the same Lebanese Health Ministry, put the toll at 3,002 dead and 13,492 wounded, including 589 women and at least 185 children.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “Hezbollah operatives”

    Why this matters
    The outlet repeats the army's description of the dead as "Hezbollah operatives" with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is told a second time, in the outlet's voice, that the people killed were all members of Hezbollah.
    The context
    This rests only on the Israeli army's word, as S7 makes clear.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“According to IDF figures, approximately 400”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    According to the Israeli army, the brigade killed about 400 people it says were Hezbollah members. The article gives no independent account of who the dead were.

  3. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “3,500 Hezbollah terrorist sites destroyed”

    Why this matters
    The headline states as fact, with no attribution, that 3,500 destroyed sites were "Hezbollah terrorist sites".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established that everything this brigade destroyed was a military target.
    The context
    The figure and the description come from the Israeli army. Same-week coverage shows the army describing a civilian home as part of the "terrorist infrastructure" it dismantles. Israeli strikes have destroyed more than 40,000 homes in Lebanon.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “the troops destroyed thousands of additional infrastructure sites used by Hezbollah”

    Why this matters
    The outlet states in its own voice that thousands of destroyed sites were "used by Hezbollah", without saying who claims this.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the destruction was confined to Hezbollah facilities.
    The context
    This is the army's own account. The article gives no independent check, and the record shows mass destruction of homes in southern Lebanon.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The Israeli army says the brigade destroyed about 3,500 sites it describes as Hezbollah infrastructure.

  4. Tells the event as something else

    Minor

    “completed eight months of operational activity in southern Lebanon”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls eight months of Israeli troops on Lebanese soil "operational activity".
    The impression it gives
    A reader understands a contained military operation, not a foreign army invading and holding territory.
    The context
    Israel invaded southern Lebanon and occupies a self-declared security zone there. The outlet itself names that zone in its earlier report on the same operations.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 3 NovIDF commanders reveal details of months inside Lebanon3.0
  2. 3 NovIsrael warns Lebanon: Fighting will resume if Hezbollah joins renewed Iran conflict6.0
  3. 2 NovFears of renewed fighting: Lebanese residents flee Beirut's Dahieh suburb3.0
  4. 1 NovWatch: Children's room with Hezbollah symbols found during IDF raids in Lebanon7.3
  5. 31 OctHezbollah admits explosives ownership as Lebanon charges 133.0

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News