CNN, on Targeting, 29 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Israel’s election ended in deadlock. Here are four ways out

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Israel faces weeks, possibly months, of political limbo after final results show there’s no clear winner in its elections. Neither of the two main blocs – one led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s right-wing Likud party, the other led by the centrist Yashar party of his main rival, Gadi Eisenkot – have reached the required 61-seat majority to form a government in Israel’s 120-seat parliament. So how could a new government be formed?

Certainly, it does not look easy, with deep-rooted political and ideological divisions making any seemingly straightforward coalition almost impossible. Still, it can be done, even if the result is a tenuous alliance that survives little more than a year or so in office. If party leaders are unable to figure it out in the 12 weeks they will have available, then Israelis will be back at the polls. Here’s some potential scenarios that could avoid that.

Scenario 1: An opposition government On paper, the opposition’s surest path to unseat Netanyahu is built on . And that is its biggest obstacle. Two of the opposition bloc’s right-wing party leaders, former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and former Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman, oppose any government that depends on – the Joint List and Raam – whether it’s from inside the coalition, or as outside supporters of a minority government.

The two leaders have hardened their positions since the Hamas-led attack of October 7, 2023. Only one government in Israel’s history has enjoyed the . Raam was part of an eight-party coalition that succeeded in ousting Netanyahu in 2021, but it collapsed just after a year in office. Even without forming a government, the opposition parties could still work together and leverage their parliamentary majority to replace the Knesset speaker, along with other key positions, and thereby constrain Netanyahu’s caretaker government as it continued in power.

But the prospects of assembling a coalition to replace him as Israel’s leader remain highly complicated and politically charged. Scenario 2: A national unity government Another option would see the implosion of the two blocs in favor of a unity government. Netanyahu’s Likud party would certainly be involved, along with some of his existing coalition partners, as well as – crucially – at least one party from the opposition bloc. Netanyahu, in this case, is believed to be willing to part ways with his far-right National Security Minister Ben-Gvir – but not from far-right Finance Minister Bezazel Smotrich and the ultra-Orthodox parties.

Eisenkot, however, has ruled out sitting with Netanyahu, and it would be seen by many Israelis desperate to see the back of ‘Bibi’ as an act of betrayal if he were to change his mind. Scenario 3: A Netanyahu bloc government with defectors Another scenario could see Netanyahu encouraging defections from opposition parties or individual lawmakers. But all four opposition bloc party leaders – Eisenkot, Bennett, Liberman and Yair Golan – have declared they will not sit with him.

And with Netanyahu’s bloc a full eight seats short, persuading eight individual defectors sets a high bar. Scenario 4: Another election While all these possibilities are being discussed in the background, Israeli President Isaac Herzog will hold a very public round of consultations with the leaders of the parties that have made it into parliament. Once he has solicited their opinions, he will task one of those leaders with the job of trying to form a government.

, so the Yashar leader could be asked to go first. Whoever gets the nod will have 28 days to complete the job, with a possible 14-day extension if needed. If it all comes to nothing, the president will ask a second leader to have a go. They get 28 days only to sort it out. After that, a majority of Knesset members could ask the president to task a third candidate, who then has 14 days to build a coalition.

If none of these produce a breakthrough, there will be another election. The person who appears best-placed to navigate this timetable is Netanyahu. As caretaker prime minister, he can afford to wait: If main rival Eisenkot gets the first shot – and fails – the mandate is likely to pass to him. And if he fails as well, the political deadlock seems certain to lead Israel to another round of elections – with Netanyahu remaining caretaker for months, until another government is formed.

A repeat election – which would happen no earlier than next spring – is a real possibility, as these results look set to return Israel to a state of political paralysis and what would be the seventh general election in eight years.

Read the original article on cnn.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

CNN explains how Israel's deadlocked election might produce a government, and most of its procedural account is plain. But in its own voice CNN calls the Palestinian citizens of Israel and the parties they vote for only "Arab". It never uses the word Palestinian for them anywhere, so a reader is never told that the coalition arithmetic turns on Palestinian voters and Palestinian-led parties.

  1. Erases a people's national identity

    Serious

    “Jewish-Arab cooperation”

    Why this matters
    CNN names the opposition's surest route to power as "Jewish-Arab cooperation". It pairs a Jewish majority with an Arab-only label for the other partners.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the partners to be an Arab minority inside Israel, with no national connection to the Palestinian people.
    The context
    The partners are parties of Palestinian citizens of Israel. Survey evidence shows most Arab citizens describe themselves with the word Palestinian. The article never uses the word Palestinian for them.

    How we know

    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Palestinian”.

    Show it in the article

    “the two Arab parties in parliament”

    Why this matters
    CNN introduces the Joint List and Raam in its own voice as "the two Arab parties". This is the passage that explains why Bennett and Liberman veto them.
    The impression it gives
    A reader learns that the veto is about depending on Arab parties. They are not told that it falls on the elected representatives of Palestinian citizens.
    The context
    The party names are official and fine to print. The descriptor around them is CNN's own, and it drops the national identity that most of these citizens give themselves, by the survey evidence in R15.

    How we know

    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “full participation of an Arab party”

    Why this matters
    CNN states the historical fact about coalitions in terms of "an Arab party".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the history of exclusion from Israeli governments to be a story about an ethnic Arab minority.
    The context
    This sentence records that parties of Palestinian citizens have almost always been kept out of government. CNN tells that history without naming the people it was done to, and nowhere else in the article supplies the word.

    How we know

    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“the two Arab parties in parliament”

    Show it in the article

    “Arab parties are expected to voice their support for Eisenkot”

    Why this matters
    In the account of the president's consultations, CNN again uses "Arab parties" as the only identity for these lawmakers.
    The impression it gives
    By the end of the piece a reader has met these parties four times, always as Arab and never as Palestinian. They come away thinking that is all they are.
    The context
    The repetition fixes the omission across the whole explainer. R15 shows most Arab citizens in a 2019 survey chose a self-description containing Palestinian. Arab and Palestinian identities coexist, and the article offers only one of them.

    How we know

    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    On paper, the opposition's surest path to unseat Netanyahu depends on the Joint List and Raam, the parties of Israel's Palestinian citizens. Bennett and Liberman oppose any government that relies on them.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from CNN

Everything we scored from CNN