Ynet News (English), on Targeting, 27 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Netanyahu vs. Eisenkot: What Israel's election exit polls mean

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

An especially dramatic night lies ahead for Israel's party leaders and voters. Exceptionally high turnout, strong participation in liberal strongholds, and renewed mobilization in Likud strongholds have created a complex political picture that remains difficult to predict even after the release of the television exit polls. With the exception of Channel 14 and i24NEWS, the polls give an advantage to the bloc seeking to replace Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, .

Polling stations across Israel closed at exactly 10 p.m. Tuesday, ending a dramatic election day marked by exceptionally high and unprecedented turnout. From early in the morning, it was clear that this was no ordinary election. Record participation was reported in liberal strongholds and among Israelis who returned from abroad specifically to vote, but there was also a surprising surge in areas traditionally loyal to Netanyahu. While most of the final pre-election polls had placed Likud as the second-largest party, exit polls suggest Netanyahu managed to mobilize his supporters and could emerge with the largest party in the Knesset, Israel's parliament.

In that sense, Netanyahu may find himself in a stronger starting position in the battle that will begin Wednesday morning over who receives the mandate from Israel's president to form the next government. Israeli law does not require the president to give the mandate to the leader of the largest party, but rather to the candidate considered most likely to form a government, giving the president broad discretion in making that decision.

Therefore, if Likud emerges as a larger party than Eisenkot's Yashar!, Netanyahu is likely to wage a fierce public campaign, using every means available to persuade the president to give him the first opportunity. Securing the first mandate carries enormous significance for the candidates. The initial period allotted to form a government is 28 days, after which the candidate can request an additional 14 days from the president. This is a critical window for the parties, because the faction whose leader receives the first mandate also gains control of the Knesset's Arrangements Committee, a powerful body responsible for managing parliamentary affairs until permanent committees are established.

Whoever chairs the committee can advance legislative initiatives while working to replace the Knesset speaker or, in Likud's case, keep the position in the party's hands. This would allow the party to establish facts on the ground before the mandate is transferred to the opposing side or a government is formed. Another dramatic factor is .

Both the television exit polls and party officials point to a combined result that could surpass the Joint List's previous record of 15 Knesset seats. In such a scenario, both rival blocs would find themselves further from the 61 seats needed for a parliamentary majority, making it difficult for either to form a government. Likud officials are pointing Tuesday evening to pollster Shlomo Filber's exit poll on Channel 14, which they say indicates a tie between the blocs, and are already looking toward their next objective.

At the same time, they stress that the night will be tense and dramatic, and that until the very end, it will be impossible to know which bloc has gained the advantage.

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Ynet reports Israel's election exit polls and the coming fight over the mandate to form a government. In its own voice it calls Palestinian citizens of Israel only "Arab citizens" and their parties "Arab parties", and the word Palestinian never appears. A reader learns of a record turnout that could decide the result without learning who these voters are as a people.

  1. Erases a people's national identity

    Serious

    “a surge in voting among Arab citizens”

    Why this matters
    Ynet names the voters behind one of the night's biggest stories only as "Arab citizens", an ethnic label, in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes these voters to be an Arab minority of Israel and nothing more, cut off from the Palestinian people.
    The context
    Most of these citizens identify as Palestinian. In Sammy Smooha's 2019 survey, 61.9% of Arab citizens of Israel chose a description containing Palestinian. Arab and Palestinian identities coexist, but the article gives only the first. The word Palestinian appears nowhere in it.

    How we know

    • Our analysis“61.9% chose a description of themselves that included Palestinian”Palestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers
    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Palestinian”.

    Show it in the article

    “although it remains dependent on Arab parties”

    Why this matters
    Ynet uses "Arab parties" in its own voice for the parties the anti-Netanyahu bloc would rely on. It does not quote a source or give an official party name.
    The impression it gives
    A reader learns that the bloc's majority hangs on parties defined only by ethnicity. The national identity of the people those parties represent is left out of the article's central political calculation.
    The context
    The voters these parties represent are Palestinian citizens of Israel, most of whom describe themselves as Palestinian according to the survey evidence. The article never says so.

    How we know

    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Our analysis“61.9% chose a description of themselves that included Palestinian”Palestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers

    Show it in the article

    “the performance of the Arab parties, whose communities have recorded a significant and unprecedented increase in voter turnout”

    Why this matters
    Ynet again says "Arab parties" and calls their voters only "communities", when reporting what it presents as a decisive factor in the result.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the record turnout as a rise among a vague ethnic minority. Nothing tells them it was a Palestinian electorate turning out in unprecedented numbers.
    The context
    Our editorial reports that Palestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers. The survey evidence shows most of them identify as Palestinian. Naming the Joint List, an official name, does not supply that identity anywhere in the article.

    How we know

    • Our analysis“61.9% chose a description of themselves that included Palestinian”Palestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers
    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Exceptionally high turnout included a surge in voting among Palestinian citizens of Israel. The exit polls give the bloc seeking to replace Netanyahu an advantage, though it depends on Palestinian-led parties.

How other outlets reported it

Our analysisPalestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)

See how 590 outlets covered this story