NewsCord
EditorialsActionDigestWatchdogBetaSupport (opens in a new tab)
Sign in
EditorialsActionDigestWatchdogSupport (opens in a new tab)
WatchdogOutletsOwnersReportersChecksFlagged by readersPress conductHow it worksReport an article

How each outlet frames the news

GazaLebanonIranWest BankUK PoliticsClimate

Loading the leaderboard…

NewsCord
NewsCord

Compare news sources. Expose media bias.

MissionEditorialsActionDigestWatchdogBetaFor OrganisationsNewPrivacy PolicyTermsContact
iOS AppAndroid App
UpScrolledXInstagram

See more NewsCord in Google Search.

Make NewsCord a preferred source on Google (opens in a new tab)
IMPRESS Regulated Member
Complaints·Corrections

© 2026 NewsCord

NewsCord
EditorialsActionDigestWatchdogBetaSupport (opens in a new tab)
Sign in
EditorialsActionDigestWatchdogSupport (opens in a new tab)
WatchdogOutletsOwnersReportersChecksFlagged by readersPress conductHow it worksReport an article

The reporters behind the UK Politics coverage

Higher scores mean more vilification of communities. Scale: 0 to 10. 30 outlets and 1,144 articles over the last 90 days.

About these scores

Ranks outlets by the share of their articles about a community (Muslims, migrants, trans people, Travellers, Jewish or Black people) that frame it, in the outlet's own voice, as a threat, as criminals, as a burden or as an invasion. Reporting what someone else said does not count.

Every article from the last 90 days is scored on the same checks. Samples under 25 articles are marked as limited, because the median can move on a few pieces. Updated 22 Oct, 18:41 UTC. How it works

Outlet type

Not enough UK Politics articles have been scored under the current methodology to name individual reporters yet. A reporter appears once at least 10 of their articles have been scored under the weights now in use, and this topic has too few of those to publish a board. It fills as new coverage is scored.

20 newsrooms measured, none of their reporters at 10 scored articles yet›

These newsrooms have scored, bylined articles in the window, spread across too many reporters for any one to reach the floor of 10. That is newsroom structure, not a gap in the data: a newsroom that rotates many reporters through a topic takes longer to put any single one on the board than one that concentrates it on a few. Each fills in as coverage accrues.

  • Daily Expressbest 6 of 10
  • GB Newsbest 5 of 10
  • Daily Mailbest 4 of 10
  • The Independentbest 4 of 10
  • The Sunbest 4 of 10
  • Daily Mirrorbest 3 of 10
  • BBC Newsbest 2 of 10
  • The Guardianbest 2 of 10
  • ITV Newsbest 2 of 10
  • Metrobest 2 of 10
  • Middle East Eyebest 2 of 10
  • The Spectatorbest 2 of 10
  • Anadolu Agency (English)best 1 of 10
  • Daily Starbest 1 of 10
  • Arutz Sheva / Israel National Newsbest 1 of 10
  • Jacobinbest 1 of 10
  • The Jerusalem Postbest 1 of 10
  • Sky Newsbest 1 of 10
  • The Nationalbest 1 of 10
  • The Times (London)best 1 of 10

Headlines are scored against the desk, not the reporter. Subeditors write headlines, so the byline score leaves headline framing out entirely. The desk headline column is the outlet's headline score over the same articles, and it is the newsroom's number, not the writer's.

A few newsrooms under-count here for reasons that are not findings about them. Sky News, the Washington Post and the Tehran Times either leave many pieces unattributed in their own page markup or block automated reads of it, so their reporters accrue more slowly than their coverage. That is a limit of what their pages let us read, not a measure of their journalism. They are fully represented on the outlet leaderboard.

Seen one that gets it wrong?

Paste the link, mark the words, and watch the Watchdog score it against the same checks. It takes about a minute, and you need no account.

Report an article

See it on the page itself.

The NewsCord browser extension marks the sentences we flagged on the outlet's own site, with the reason under each. Free, and no account needed.

Add to Chrome