Climateupdated 1h ago3 min read
Democrats Flip Governors’ Offices in Georgia, Iowa, Ohio, Nevada, and Texas
“The next two years likely won’t bring aggressive climate policy, nonetheless a shift is expected as a result of the midterms.”
“Flipping control of Congress will allow the Democrats to hinder Trump’s numerous attempts to roll back federal climate policy.”
This article is an automated aggregation of coverage from news outlets. Our editorials offer in-depth analysis curated by the NewsCord team.
Democrats gain control of multiple state governorships and Texas House, expanding party trifectas. Statehouse wins boost prospects for climate and clean energy legislation.
Save coverage image
Blue power shifts
Democrats flipped control of governors’ offices from Republicans in Georgia, Iowa, Ohio, Nevada, and Texas, and Democrats have a 29-19 edge in governorships with Kansas too close to call and Alaska likely to take a while to declare a winner. Democrats won five new trifectas, naming Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, and those additions would give the party 22 trifectas with Republicans holding unified control in 18 states and nine with split control. The Democratic sweep will have “profound consequences for climate action in the United States,” because flipping control of Congress would allow Democrats to hinder President Donald Trump’s attempts to roll back federal climate policy.
Caroline Spears, executive director of Climate Cabinet, said in a conference call, “In the states, we had a generational political window shift to make people’s lives better, to lower costs and to lower climate pollution at the same time,” as the party moved toward more climate and clean energy legislation. Grist said the Democratic sweep will have “profound consequences for climate action in the United States,” because flipping control of Congress would allow Democrats to hinder President Donald Trump’s attempts to roll back federal climate policy.
Energy costs and data centers
The United States left a summer marked by intense heat waves that spiked energy demand, while electricity and fuel prices rose steadily, and Democratic candidates tied their campaigns to reinvigorating clean energy to reduce rates. Lisa Sachs, an associate professor at Columbia Climate School, argued that “At home, data centers are increasing emissions, raising household energy bills,” and Sachs also linked the issue to competition with communities for water. Texas became a new epicenter of data center deployments for AI, and the blue wave could jeopardize that position.
Michigan’s new leaders and ballot outcomes could affect data center development, and Abdul El-Sayed released “terms of engagement” for data centers in January that he said would protect other utility ratepayers from data center costs and require projects to comply with clean energy laws. Ars Technica said Democrats’ state-level gains were expected to open a “generational political window” for lowering climate pollution alongside lowering costs, as the party’s momentum intersected with voter concerns about energy affordability.
What comes next
The next two years likely won’t bring aggressive climate policy because Democrats still face “an executive branch with a veto power controlled by President Trump,” but Democrats now have “a stronger hand to play.” Chellie Pingree, a Democrat who won reelection in Maine, serves on the House Appropriations Committee and has said that she plans to force the administration to spend climate money. Democrats could use subpoenas to force administration officials to testify before Congress and could even impeach Trump administration figures over funding clawbacks and staff reductions that Democrats have called unlawful.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, Interior Secretary Doug Bergam, and Energy Secretary Chris Wright are going to be spending a lot of their time testifying in front of congressional committees, and Democrats may use litigation and funding leverage to hinder anti-environmental initiatives. Edelman said the shift in control of both houses will reshape Washington and constrain the Trump administration’s legislative agenda, while it said Democrats’ subpoena power in both chambers would give new committee chairs authority to investigate federal agencies and businesses and compel testimony and documents.