Press TV, on Iran, 31 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman denounces Canada’s ‘absurd’ endorsement of UAE claims over

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei has strongly condemned a joint statement by the United Arab Emirates and Canada regarding the three Iranian islands of Abu Musa, Greater Tunb and Lesser Tunb in the Persian Gulf.

In a post on X on Saturday morning, Baghaei described the UAE’s territorial claims as absurd and Canada’s decision to echo them as short-sighted and contrary to the fundamental principles of the UN Charter.

He underlined that the UAE was only established in 1971, yet despite the overwhelming historical record, geographical facts and documented evidence, it continues to lay claim to the Iranian islands “whose history of being part of IRAN stretches back many millennia before the establishment of the federation itself.”

“Remarkably, Canada’s Prime Minister has chosen to echo this absurd claim!” Baghaei said.

The UAE was established in 1971. Yet, despite the overwhelming historical record، geographical facts and documented evidence concerning Abu Musa and the Greater Tunb and Lesser Tunb, it lays claim to these IRANIAN islands whose history of being part of IRAN stretches back many… pic.twitter.com/0963yGI7XX

— Esmaeil Baqaei (@IRIMFA_SPOX) October 31, 2026

He noted that Canada, of all countries, must understand the importance of territorial integrity and national sovereignty, pointing to its own history marked by the American invasion during the War of 1812, the Montreal Annexation Manifesto of 1849, and more recently Donald Trump’s repeated threats to turn Canada into the 51st state of the United States.

“A country that has spent more than two centuries defending its territorial integrity against the ambitions of its southern neighbour — how can it take sides in a fabricated dispute and endorse an unfounded territorial claim that amounts to dangerous adventurism?” Baghaei asked.

“Is territorial integrity and respect for historical and legal facts a fundamental principle for Canada, or does it matter only when Canada’s own sovereignty is at stake? Does Canada not realize that, in doing so, it is effectively sawing off the very branch on which it sits?”

Earlier this week, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and issued a joint statement calling for an end to what they described as the “occupation” of the three islands, alleging that it violates the UAE’s sovereignty and the principles of the UN Charter.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says that Canada had already endorsed the UAE claim in a joint statement in November 2025, or that the new statement came as the two countries moved to a strategic partnership. Without this, a reader takes Canada's 'decision to echo' the claim as a new shift in policy.

How we know

Baghaei reiterated that Abu Musa, Greater Tunb and Lesser Tunb are inseparable and eternal parts of Iranian territory, stressing that the repetition of illusory and baseless claims will not alter established geographical, historical and legal realities.

The Persian Gulf islands of Abu Musa and the Greater and Lesser Tunbs . However, the United Arab Emirates .

The islands fell under British control in 1921, but on November 30, 1971 -- a day after British forces left the region and just two days before the UAE was to become an official federation -- . Iran has since exercised over the territories, and has formally registered ownership documents for them in the name of the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Baghaei advised the UAE government to adhere to the principle of good neighborliness instead of fruitlessly repeating territorial claims against a major neighboring country.

Read the original article on presstv.ir (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

Press TV reports Esmaeil Baghaei's condemnation of a Canada and UAE joint statement on Abu Musa and the Tunbs, then states Iran's side of the dispute as settled fact in its own voice. It calls the UAE claim baseless and Iran's control 'undisputed', although its own report of the joint statement shows the islands are disputed. It also gives the Emirati leader a title other coverage does not.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “have historically been part of Iran, proof of which can be found and corroborated by countless historical, legal and geographical documents in Iran and other parts of the world”

    Why this matters
    In its own narration, not Baghaei's, Press TV states that the islands have always been Iranian and that countless documents prove it.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes the islands' ownership as an established fact that the outlet has checked.
    The context
    This is Iran's position in a live territorial dispute. The UAE and Canada call Iran's presence an occupation, as the article itself reports. No document is named.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “has repeatedly laid baseless claim to the islands”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls the UAE claim 'baseless' in its own voice, repeating Baghaei's verdict without attribution.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes the UAE has no case at all, as a matter of fact rather than Iran's view.
    The context
    'Baseless' is Baghaei's word, quoted in S11. The outlet adopts it as its own judgement on a claim that Canada has now endorsed.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the repetition of illusory and baseless claims will not alter”

    Show it in the article

    “Iran’s sovereignty over the islands was restored”

    Why this matters
    Press TV describes the events of November 1971 as a restoration of sovereignty, which is Iran's account of them.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes Iran simply recovered what was already its own, as an agreed fact.
    The context
    The UAE and Canada describe Iran's presence since then as an occupation. The outlet gives only one side's description of what happened in 1971.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“alleging that it violates the UAE’s sovereignty”

    Show it in the article

    “Iranian trio islands”

    Why this matters
    The headline calls the islands Iranian in the outlet's own words, outside the attributed denunciation.
    The impression it gives
    The reader starts the article treating the islands' nationality as settled before any claim is set out.
    The context
    Ownership is exactly what the joint statement disputes. The body only attributes 'Iranian' to Baghaei's words in S3 and S11.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“what they described as the “occupation” of the three islands”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Iran says the islands have historically been Iranian and that the UAE claim is baseless; the UAE, now backed by Canada, calls Iran's presence since 1971 an occupation.

  2. Makes a false claim

    Serious

    “continuous, effective and undisputed control”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls Iran's control of the islands 'undisputed' in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes no one contests Iran's control of the islands.
    The context
    The article itself reports that the UAE repeatedly claims the islands and that the UAE and Canada have just called for an end to Iran's 'occupation'. The control is disputed, and the whole article is about that dispute.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Iran has controlled the islands since 1971, a control the UAE contests and has repeatedly called an occupation.

  3. Misstates an official's title

    Minor

    “UAE President Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan”

    Why this matters
    Press TV names Sheikh Khaled as UAE President.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes the UAE head of state signed the joint statement.
    The context
    Tehran Times, reporting the same meeting in Ottawa, names him as Abu Dhabi Crown Prince.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that Canada had already endorsed the UAE claim in a joint statement in November 2025, or that the new statement came as the two countries moved to a strategic partnership. Without this, a reader takes Canada's 'decision to echo' the claim as a new shift in policy.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 31 OctIran7.3
  2. 30 OctIran0.0
  3. 30 OctThree offending tankers catch fire in Strait of Hormuz after defying Iranian warnings: IRGC6.0
  4. 30 OctIran3.0
  5. 29 OctIran6.0

Everything we scored from Press TV

See how 6 outlets covered this story