Press TV, on Iran, 31 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Iran

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei has strongly condemned a joint statement by the United Arab Emirates and Canada regarding the three Iranian islands of Abu Musa, Greater Tunb and Lesser Tunb in the Persian Gulf. In a post on X on Saturday morning, Baghaei described the UAE’s territorial claims as absurd and Canada’s decision to echo them as short-sighted and contrary to the fundamental principles of the UN Charter. He underlined that the UAE was only established in 1971, yet despite the overwhelming historical record, geographical facts and documented evidence, it continues to lay claim to the Iranian islands “whose history of being part of IRAN stretches back many millennia before the establishment of the federation itself.”

“Remarkably, Canada’s Prime Minister has chosen to echo this absurd claim!” Baghaei said. The UAE was established in 1971. Yet, despite the overwhelming historical record، geographical facts and documented evidence concerning Abu Musa and the Greater Tunb and Lesser Tunb, it lays claim to these IRANIAN islands whose history of being part of IRAN stretches back many… pic.twitter.com/0963yGI7XX — Esmaeil Baqaei (@IRIMFA_SPOX) October 31, 2026 He noted that Canada, of all countries, must understand the importance of territorial integrity and national sovereignty, pointing to its own history marked by the American invasion during the War of 1812, the Montreal Annexation Manifesto of 1849, and more recently Donald Trump’s repeated threats to turn Canada into the 51st state of the United States.

“A country that has spent more than two centuries defending its territorial integrity against the ambitions of its southern neighbour — how can it take sides in a fabricated dispute and endorse an unfounded territorial claim that amounts to dangerous adventurism?” Baghaei asked. “Is territorial integrity and respect for historical and legal facts a fundamental principle for Canada, or does it matter only when Canada’s own sovereignty is at stake?

Does Canada not realize that, in doing so, it is effectively sawing off the very branch on which it sits?” Earlier this week, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and issued a joint statement calling for an end to what they described as the “occupation” of the three islands, alleging that it violates the UAE’s sovereignty and the principles of the UN Charter. Baghaei reiterated that Abu Musa, Greater Tunb and Lesser Tunb are inseparable and eternal parts of Iranian territory, stressing that the repetition of illusory and baseless claims will not alter established geographical, historical and legal realities.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says that Canada had already endorsed the UAE's claim in a joint statement in November 2025, or that the new statement came as the two countries moved to a strategic partnership. Without this, Baghaei's "Remarkably, Canada's Prime Minister has chosen to echo" reads as a sudden new Canadian departure.

The Persian Gulf islands of Abu Musa and the Greater and Lesser Tunbs in Iran and other parts of the world. However, . The islands fell under British control in 1921, but on November 30, 1971 -- a day after British forces left the region and just two days before the UAE was to become an official federation -- .

Iran has since exercised over the territories, and has formally registered ownership documents for them in the name of the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Baghaei advised the UAE government to adhere to the principle of good neighborliness instead of fruitlessly repeating territorial claims against a major neighboring country.

Read the original article on presstv.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

Press TV reports Esmaeil Baghaei's condemnation of a Canada and UAE joint statement on Abu Musa and the Tunbs, but then adopts Iran's position on the islands in its own voice. It declares the islands historically Iranian, calls the UAE claim baseless and calls Iran's control undisputed, though its own article reports that the UAE and Canada contest it. It also names the Emirati signatory with a title that other coverage contradicts.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “have historically been part of Iran, proof of which can be found and corroborated by countless historical, legal and geographical documents”

    Why this matters
    Press TV states in its own narration, with no attribution, that the islands have historically been part of Iran and that countless documents prove it.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes Iran's sovereignty over the islands as settled fact that the outlet has checked, not as one party's position in a dispute.
    The context
    The sovereignty of the islands is contested. The article itself reports that the UAE and Canada called for an end to what they described as an occupation. Tehran Times frames Iran's ownership as what Iran has consistently maintained. The outlet cites no document of its own.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “the United Arab Emirates has repeatedly laid baseless claim to the islands”

    Why this matters
    Press TV takes Baghaei's word "baseless" from S11 and uses it as its own verdict on the UAE's claim.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes the outlet has independently established that the UAE claim has no basis.
    The context
    "Baseless" is the Iranian Foreign Ministry's characterisation, reported as Baghaei's in S11. The outlet gives no evidence of its own for it.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the repetition of illusory and baseless claims will not alter”

    Show it in the article

    “Iran’s sovereignty over the islands was restored”

    Why this matters
    Press TV describes Iran's 1971 takeover as sovereignty being "restored", which is the Iranian account of the event, in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes that the 1971 change of control was simply a return of rightful ownership, accepted by all.
    The context
    The UAE describes Iran's presence on the islands as an occupation that violates its sovereignty, as the article itself reports. The word "restored" settles that dispute for the reader without attribution.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“alleging that it violates the UAE’s sovereignty”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Iran says the islands of Abu Musa and the Greater and Lesser Tunbs have historically been Iranian and that its sovereignty was restored in 1971; the UAE, now backed by Canada, says Iran occupies them in violation of UAE sovereignty.

  2. Makes a false claim

    Serious

    “continuous, effective and undisputed control”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls Iran's control of the islands "undisputed" in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes that no one challenges Iran's control of the islands.
    The context
    The article's own reporting contradicts this. S10 reports a joint statement calling Iran's presence an occupation, and S13 says the UAE has repeatedly laid claim to the islands. Tehran Times reports that Canada endorsed the same claim in November 2025.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Iran has controlled the islands since 1971, a control the UAE disputes and describes as occupation.

  3. Makes a false claim

    Minor

    “UAE President Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan”

    Why this matters
    Press TV gives Sheikh Khaled the title of UAE President.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes the statement was signed by the UAE head of state.
    The context
    Tehran Times, reporting the same meeting, identifies him as the Abu Dhabi Crown Prince.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that Canada had already endorsed the UAE's claim in a joint statement in November 2025, or that the new statement came as the two countries moved to a strategic partnership. Without this, Baghaei's "Remarkably, Canada's Prime Minister has chosen to echo" reads as a sudden new Canadian departure.

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 31 OctIran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman denounces Canada’s ‘absurd’ endorsement of UAE claims over Iranian trio islands7.3
  2. 30 OctThree offending tankers catch fire in Strait of Hormuz after defying Iranian warnings: IRGC6.0
  3. 29 OctIRGC Navy captures, lands US spy drone intact in Strait of Hormuz7.3
  4. 29 OctFormer US president Obama warns war on Iran has left US ‘more vulnerable’ as Tehran holds Hormuz ‘veto power’3.0
  5. 29 OctIRGC Navy captures, lands US spy drone intact in Strait of Hormuz6.0

Everything we scored from Press TV