Ynet News (English), on West Bank, 25 October 2026

Ynet reports Israel's post-shooting operations in Hebron almost entirely in the Israeli military's vocabulary: it calls the two Palestinians killed "terrorists" in its own voice, never writes the word occupied, presents settlements as ordinary waypoints on a highway, and folds settler attacks on olive harvesters into "tensions", "friction" and "clashes". It names the two Israeli soldiers killed with their ranks while Palestinians appear only as counts of "suspects", and it leaves out the siege of Hebron, the expulsion of residents and the election-day closure of all West Bank crossings to Palestinians that other outlets reported on the same events.

9.7

Severe

out of 10

What we found

  1. Labels people on one side's word

    Severe

    “the two terrorists responsible for Friday's attack”

    What the words do
    Ynet, in its own voice and with no attribution, calls the two Palestinians killed "terrorists" and declares them "responsible" for the shooting.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That a court or an investigation has established who these men were and what they did, and that calling them terrorists is simply the fact of the matter.
    What is actually the case
    Everything the article knows about the shooting comes from the Israeli military, as it concedes elsewhere when it writes "According to the military's account". Other outlets reporting the same event describe them as two Palestinians who opened fire on soldiers at a checkpoint and were shot dead; the label is the army's verdict, not a finding.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “the two terrorists exchanged fire”

    What the words do
    Repeats the label a second time while describing newly released footage, attaching the verdict to the outlet's own description of what the video shows.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the footage itself proves a terror attack, rather than showing an exchange of fire between armed Palestinians and soldiers.
    What is actually the case
    The footage was released by the military and the account of the gunfight in the next sentence is expressly the military's. The coverage of the same incident describes a 20-minute exchange of fire with Israeli troops at a checkpoint.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “suspects involved in terrorist activity”

    What the words do
    Describes the targets of mass arrests across the West Bank, in the outlet's own voice, as people involved in terrorist activity.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the roughly 50 people rounded up in Hebron are terrorists or their helpers.
    What is actually the case
    The article gives no charge, no name and no evidence for any of the detainees; its own account of the one arrest it details notes that "No weapons were found in his possession at the time of the arrest".

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“No weapons were found in his possession”

    Show it in the article

    “disrupting terrorist networks”

    What the words do
    Adopts the army's description of its raids as network-disruption as the outlet's own factual account of what the raids are.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the raids and arrests outside Hebron are dismantling proven terrorist networks.
    What is actually the case
    The next sentence shows this is the military's own claim about its purpose; Ynet states it unattributed here. No evidence of any network appears anywhere in the article.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The military said its efforts are intended”

    Show it in the article

    “deadly West Bank terror shooting”

    What the words do
    Puts the label in the headline, where it is carried by the outlet alone with no source at all.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That "terror shooting" is the established description of an attack on soldiers at a checkpoint.
    What is actually the case
    The body sources the account of the shooting to the military, and other outlets report it as two Palestinians firing on Israeli troops at a checkpoint.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli troops sealed the homes of the two Palestinians the military says carried out Friday's shooting at a checkpoint near Hebron, in which two Israeli soldiers were killed. Both men were shot dead by Israeli forces during the exchange of fire.

  2. Hedges the documented record

    Serious

    “Israeli settlements”

    What the words do
    Lists settlements alongside "Palestinian cities" as ordinary destinations on a highway, with no word about their legal status.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Israeli settlements in the West Bank are normal towns, equivalent in standing to the Palestinian cities on the same road.
    What is actually the case
    The International Court of Justice found in July 2024 that Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are illegal under international law, and that the occupation itself is unlawful. The word occupied appears nowhere in this article.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “across the territory”

    What the words do
    Names the West Bank as "the territory" when describing the expansion of Israeli military operations in it, leaving the relationship between army and land unstated.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the Israeli military operates in the West Bank as it would anywhere under its lawful authority.
    What is actually the case
    The ICJ ruled in July 2024 that Israel's presence in the West Bank and East Jerusalem is an unlawful occupation. Nowhere in 53 sentences does Ynet call the West Bank occupied.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli occupation forces expanded operations across the occupied West Bank, where the ICJ ruled in July 2024 that Israel's presence is unlawful and its settlements illegal.

  3. Softens settler violence

    Serious

    “a source of friction between Palestinian farmers and Israeli settlers”

    What the words do
    Casts settler attacks on farmers reaching their own land as mutual "friction" between two parties.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Palestinian farmers and settlers are two comparable sides rubbing against each other over land access.
    What is actually the case
    The settlers are armed by the Israeli state and move with the army, and the land in question is Palestinian farmland in occupied territory. Naming it friction removes the attacker from the sentence.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “reduce the risk of clashes during the harvest”

    What the words do
    Turns one-sided attacks on harvesters into "clashes" the army is deployed to prevent.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That soldiers stand between two groups who fight each other.
    What is actually the case
    Settler raids on the harvest are attacks on Palestinians, and settlers operate armed by the state and accompanied by Israeli forces, the same forces the article presents here as neutral protectors.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The olive harvest in the occupied West Bank has again been disrupted by Israeli settler attacks on Palestinian farmers; settlers in the West Bank are armed by the state and are often accompanied by soldiers.

  4. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “a practice authorities defend as a deterrent”

    What the words do
    Closes the section on punitive home demolitions with the Israeli authorities' justification and nothing against it.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That punitive demolition is a contested security tool whose main defence is deterrence and whose critics have nothing to say.
    What is actually the case
    Demolishing the family homes of alleged attackers is punishment of people not accused of any offence. The article gives no counter-view, no legal objection and no word from the families whose homes are to be destroyed.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“intends to proceed with demolishing the properties”

    Show it in the article

    “the overwhelming majority of coordinated harvesting activities conducted under security protection had proceeded without unusual incidents”

    What the words do
    Ends the olive harvest passage with Israeli defence officials' reassurance, unanswered by any Palestinian farmer, mayor or rights group.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That settler attacks on the harvest are a marginal problem now under control.
    What is actually the case
    The claim counts only harvesting that took place under army coordination and protection, which excludes land Palestinians cannot reach at all. No Palestinian voice appears anywhere in the article to test it.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Israeli defense officials said confrontations had affected only a small percentage”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli officials say confrontations affected only a small share of coordinated harvesting; Palestinian farmers and rights monitors report settler attacks across the occupied West Bank, and land that cannot be reached at all is not counted in the army's figures.

  5. Writes Palestinians out of their own story

    Serious

    “Yuval Shai Svilem and left three other soldiers lightly wounded”

    What the words do
    Gives the Israeli dead their full names and ranks and records even the lightly wounded.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That these are the people this story is about and the only ones whose identities matter.
    What is actually the case
    The two Palestinians killed in the same incident are never named, and nor is any of the roughly 50 people arrested, any resident whose home was sealed, or any olive farmer. Palestinians appear in the article only as suspects and as counts.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“approximately 50 suspects have been arrested”

    Show it in the article

    “arresting 12 additional suspects”

    What the words do
    Reduces 12 named-nowhere Palestinians to a running tally in a military operation update.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the people taken from their homes in Hebron are an undifferentiated quantity of suspects.
    What is actually the case
    Other coverage of the same operation reports hundreds of Palestinians expelled from their homes in Hebron and quotes the city's mayor calling it "a disaster zone". Not one Palestinian is quoted in this article.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  6. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    “efforts to reshape parts of the operational environment to make it easier for troops to maneuver”

    What the words do
    Describes the clearing of built-up Palestinian areas in Hebron as reshaping an "operational environment", with no houses, no residents and no demolition in the sentence.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the army is adjusting terrain for tactical convenience, affecting nobody.
    What is actually the case
    Other outlets reporting the same operation say Israel has expelled hundreds of Palestinians from their homes in Hebron and that Netanyahu said of the area the gunmen came from, "We will act to destroy this place", adding that the army "will evacuate the residents".

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    As part of the Hebron operation Israeli forces are demolishing structures and clearing ground to ease troop movement; hundreds of Palestinians have been expelled from their homes in the city since Friday, and Netanyahu said the army would destroy the area the gunmen came from and remove its residents.

  7. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article never tells the reader that all of the occupied West Bank's land crossings are being closed to Palestinians for Israel's election day, and that Palestinian workers are barred from entering settlements from Sunday to Tuesday. A reader of this article believes the election-time measures amount to arrests, patrols and checkpoints, not a blanket closure cutting millions of Palestinians off from work and movement.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  8. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article presents the Hebron operation as arrests and searches with "no end date", omitting that Netanyahu ordered the army to lay siege to the city of about 250,000 people and prepare a full West Bank lockdown, and that hundreds of residents have been expelled from their homes. Without this a reader believes the operation is a targeted manhunt rather than a city-wide siege.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

Israel fears copycat attacks ahead of election after

Security forces have heightened their alert across the West Bank amid fears of copycat attacks following a deadly shooting near Hebron on Friday, stepping up arrests, patrols and counterterrorism operations less than two days before the national election.

The military said Sunday that troops had arrested a suspect believed to be planning an imminent attack on Highway 60, a major highway used daily by Israeli motorists in the West Bank. The arrest came as security forces continued a large-scale operation in Hebron, where approximately 50 suspects have been detained and more than 500 locations searched.

The heightened security measures follow Friday's shooting near the West Bank city, which killed Staff Sgt. Ron Yonatan Roytman and Sgt. .

Defense officials are particularly concerned that the attack could inspire additional assaults in the days leading up to Tuesday's election, prompting the military to expand its operational presence .

Alongside the security operations, the IDF launched a major military exercise Sunday involving four divisions and the air force, aimed at strengthening readiness across several regions.

Suspect arrested over alleged imminent attack

In the Binyamin area of the central West Bank, soldiers from the Paratroopers Brigade's 202nd Battalion arrested a suspect believed to be preparing an attack on Highway 60.

The operation followed specific intelligence provided by the Shin Bet domestic security agency.

Acting on the information, troops established a checkpoint along the highway and detained the suspect.

No weapons were found in his possession at the time of the arrest, and he was transferred to security authorities for further questioning.

Highway 60 is one of the West Bank's main north-south highways, connecting several major Palestinian cities and . It is heavily traveled by Israeli motorists and has been the site of previous attacks.

The arrest was part of a broader effort to prevent further violence following Friday's shooting.

Security forces have intensified raids, patrols and arrests at several locations across the West Bank, seeking to identify and prevent additional attacks inspired by the Hebron incident.

Homes of two gunmen sealed ahead of demolition

Israeli troops also sealed the homes of , following an order signed by the head of the military's Central Command authorizing their seizure and temporary closure.

The military intends to proceed with demolishing the properties.

Both gunmen were killed in exchanges of fire with Israeli security forces during the attack.

Israel has long used punitive home demolitions against Palestinians who carried out deadly attacks, .

New footage released Sunday showed the confrontation at Yehuda Junction, near Hebron, where with the command group of the deputy commander of the 755th Battalion.

According to the military's account, command teams from the battalion and paratrooper forces rushed to the scene and engaged the attackers in a gunbattle that ended with both gunmen dead.

The military said the soldiers' response prevented the attackers from reaching a nearby road used by Israeli motorists, potentially averting a more serious attack.

Hebron operation continues with no end date

Israeli forces continued their operation in Hebron overnight, with troops from the Paratroopers Brigade and the elite Maglan commando unit .

The troops also confiscated vehicles described by the military as illegal and located weapons.

Since the operation began, approximately 50 suspects have been arrested and security forces have searched more than 500 locations throughout the city.

The military has not announced when the operation will end, saying its duration will depend on ongoing security assessments.

Israeli forces are also maintaining an expanded presence outside Hebron, conducting raids and arrests aimed at and preventing attacks elsewhere in the West Bank.

The military said its efforts are intended both to apprehend suspects involved in terrorist activity and to prevent the establishment of infrastructure that could support future attacks.

With the election approaching, defense officials are particularly concerned about attempts to imitate Friday's shooting or carry out attacks inspired by the incident.

Alongside the raids, the military has instructed soldiers stationed along roads, at intersections, checkpoints and security posts to tighten operational procedures.

The measures are intended to improve the identification of threats in real time, stop attacks before they develop and reduce risks to troops operating in the area.

The Hebron operation also includes the removal of structures the military considers illegal and and identify threats.

Four divisions and air force join major military drill

Meanwhile, a large-scale military exercise began Sunday involving the IDF's West Bank Division, the 98th, 96th and 210th divisions, along with the Israeli Air Force.

The exercise is taking place in areas under the responsibility of the participating regional divisions.

According to the military, the drill was planned as part of the Operations Directorate's 2026 training program and is intended to strengthen operational readiness, rehearse military procedures and incorporate lessons learned from the war.

The military said the exercise also aims to improve the defense of Israeli communities and strengthen coordination with air forces supporting ground operations.

Increased movement of troops, military vehicles and aircraft is expected Sunday and Monday in areas under the military's Central and Northern commands.

The IDF emphasized that the exercise had been scheduled in advance and that the increased military activity was not an indication of a new security incident.

The drill comes amid heightened alert levels ahead of the election, with the military seeking to maintain readiness for threats across several fronts.

Security forces reinforce West Bank olive harvest

The military also provided an update Sunday on security arrangements during the annual olive harvest in the West Bank, which has been accompanied by tensions and incidents of nationalist violence.

According to IDF figures, approximately 220,000 dunams, or 54,400 acres, of olive groves have been harvested so far this season.

Security forces have coordinated protection at approximately 100 harvesting locations.

The military estimated that about 22,500 metric tons of olives have been collected, producing approximately 5,500 liters of olive oil.

Despite recent incidents of nationalist violence, including attacks connected to the harvest, Israeli defense officials said confrontations had affected only a small percentage of the areas being harvested.

They maintained that .

To facilitate the harvest and prevent confrontations, violence and attacks, the military has reinforced its Central Command with additional forces.

The reinforcements include the headquarters of the 98th Division, a task force headquarters from the Paratroopers Brigade, a regular infantry battalion and Border Police companies.

The forces have been deployed throughout the West Bank to provide security, prevent attacks and .

The olive harvest is an important source of income for many Palestinian families, and access to agricultural land has frequently been .

The additional deployments come as the military balances several security priorities, including protecting civilians, preventing attacks and maintaining a heightened operational presence before Tuesday's election.

For Israeli security officials, the immediate concern remains the possibility that Friday's deadly shooting could trigger further attacks.

With no announced end date for the Hebron operation and troops continuing arrests and patrols across the West Bank, the military is seeking to prevent another deadly incident during the final days of the election campaign.

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

  1. 26 OctNot just Iran: Netanyahu defies IDF chief over continuing Hebron operation8.8
  2. 26 OctNot just Iran: Netanyahu defies IDF chief over continuing Hebron operation9.4
  3. 25 OctIsrael's fate will be decided in the West Bank, not just at the ballot box0.0
  4. 23 OctIDF and Shin Bet launch counterterrorism operation in Hebron ...9.1
  5. 23 OctHelmet camera footage shows Israeli forces battling terrorists near ...9.4

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)