Ynet News (English), on West Bank, 23 October 2026

Ynet calls the two men killed near Hebron "terrorists" in its own headline, with nothing behind the word but the account of a settlement security chief and an investigation that has only just been assigned. It passes on the army's vocabulary as its own ("offensive counterterrorism operations", "Judea and Samaria"), reports the demolition of "illegal infrastructure" with no actor and no permit context, and never uses the word Palestinian once, so the lockdown of two Palestinian cities reaches the reader with no sign of the people inside them.

9.4

Severe

out of 10

What we found

  1. Labels people on one side's word

    Severe

    “Israeli forces battling terrorists”

    What the words do
    The headline puts the word "terrorists" in Ynet's own voice for the two men Israeli forces shot dead.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That it is established fact that the two men killed were terrorists.
    What is actually the case
    The only basis in the article is the account of Kiryat Arba's security chief, who took part in the shooting, and the article itself says the attack has only just been handed to police investigators and the Shin Bet. No identification of the dead, and no evidence beyond the participant's account, appears anywhere in the piece.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“assist the Shin Bet security agency in investigating the attack”
    • Elsewhere in the article“we exchanged fire for about 20 minutes”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Helmet camera footage shows Israeli forces in a gunfight near Hebron in which two Palestinian men were shot dead; police say the attack is still under investigation.

  2. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “conducting offensive counterterrorism operations in Hebron and surrounding villages”

    What the words do
    Ynet describes army raids on a Palestinian city and its villages in the army's own term, "offensive counterterrorism operations", without attribution.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That what the troops are doing in Hebron is settled, legitimate counterterrorism rather than a military raid on an occupied population.
    What is actually the case
    The description is the security establishment's, voiced in the article by the settlement security chief who praises the army for "numerous operations". The article gives no independent account of what the troops are doing in those villages.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“carrying out numerous operations to maintain residents' security”

    Show it in the article

    “to reinforce counterterrorism and defensive operations”

    What the words do
    Repeats the army's framing a second time, in Ynet's voice, for the deployment of an elite unit alongside a city-wide lockdown and dozens of roadblocks.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That sealing two cities and flooding them with troops is purely defensive.
    What is actually the case
    The same sentence reports a "full lockdown" on Hebron and Halhul and roadblocks across the area, measures imposed on a whole civilian population, which the article never describes in any terms other than the army's.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“troops from the IDF's Duvdevan undercover unit”

    Show it in the article

    “Judea and Samaria District Commander”

    What the words do
    Uses the Israeli state's name for the occupied West Bank in Ynet's own voice.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That "Judea and Samaria" is the neutral name of the territory.
    What is actually the case
    The territory is the occupied West Bank, which the ICJ found in July 2024 to be unlawfully occupied; the article elsewhere manages to write "West Bank".

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“along with Border Police forces in the West Bank”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Since Friday morning, Israeli occupation forces have been raiding Hebron and nearby villages, and the Israeli police commander for the occupied West Bank, Maj. Gen. Moshe Pinchi, has ordered an investigation.

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    “all illegal infrastructure”

    What the words do
    Calls the structures being destroyed "illegal" in Ynet's own voice, with no explanation of why they are classed that way.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That unlawful buildings are simply being removed.
    What is actually the case
    The article gives no permit context at all: in Area C of the occupied West Bank Palestinian building permits are almost never granted, which is what makes Palestinian structures there "illegal". The article also never says who owns or uses them.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “permit” and “Area C”.

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Demolition has begun of Palestinian structures near the site, built without Israeli permits of the kind that Palestinians in Area C are almost never granted.

  4. Writes Palestinians out of their own story

    Serious

    “five people were wounded, two of them critically”

    What the words do
    Counts and grades the Israeli wounded in Ynet's voice.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the people harmed in this story are the five wounded, and that the only other figures involved are two attackers.
    What is actually the case
    The word Palestinian never appears in the article. The two men shot dead are named only as "terrorists" inside a quotation, with no identities, and no Palestinian in Hebron is quoted or described anywhere.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Palestinian”.

    Show it in the article

    “a full lockdown has been imposed on the cities of Hebron and Halhul”

    What the words do
    Reports the sealing of two Palestinian cities as a line in a list of military measures.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That a lockdown is a technical security step with no human subject.
    What is actually the case
    The people confined are the Palestinian residents of Hebron and Halhul, who appear nowhere in the article; every voice in the piece is Israeli, and no resident or local official of either city is quoted on what the lockdown means.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“to maintain residents' security and protect roads and communities”

    Show it in the article

  5. Hedges the documented record

    Minor

    “the security chief of Kiryat Arba”

    What the words do
    Introduces Kiryat Arba as an ordinary place with a security chief, buses and schools.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Kiryat Arba is a normal Israeli town beside Hebron.
    What is actually the case
    Kiryat Arba is an Israeli settlement in the occupied West Bank. The ICJ found in July 2024 that Israel's settlements there are illegal under international law and the occupation unlawful. The article never uses the word settlement or occupied.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

  6. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “He praised the security forces”

    What the words do
    Hands the article over to a settlement security official's praise of the army, after eleven sentences of his account.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the assessment of the operation in Hebron comes from a disinterested witness.
    What is actually the case
    Every voice in the piece is Israeli: the settlement security chief who took part in the shooting and the Israeli police district commander. No Palestinian from Hebron or Halhul is quoted, though the lockdown and demolitions fall on them.

    How we know

    • On the recordReporting on Israel's assault on Gaza and on the Greens' Zionism motion has given Israeli, pro-Israel and Israeli-government sources far more space than Palestinian voices, who are quoted least when the story concerns them.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“Police said a situation assessment had been completed”

    Show it in the article

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

Helmet camera footage shows near ...

Moshe Botavia, , took part in the gunbattle during Friday morning's shooting attack at the Yehuda Junction near Hebron, in which .

"We received a report of a shooting attack targeting a military force on Route 35, with casualties. Security forces from the area rushed to the scene, including me," he told ynet. "The terrorists arrived in a vehicle, stopped at a point where they could not be seen, quickly got out and opened fire."

Watch footage from his helmet camera:

"In the morning, residents are traveling along the road, including buses taking students to schools in Kiryat Arba. I arrived at the scene about 15 minutes after the incident began. When I got there, I joined the fighting. Two terrorists were firing from higher ground, and we exchanged fire for about 20 minutes until a force commanded by the deputy battalion commander responsible for the area killed the terrorists.

Describing the scene, Botavia said, "The terrorists arrived in a 'mashtuba' (an illegally operated, deregistered) vehicle with a yellow Israeli license plate. The soldiers at the scene prevented the attack from spreading to the main road and endangering passersby. That prevented a much greater disaster."

, saying, "The army works hard every night, carrying out numerous operations to maintain residents' security and protect roads and communities. We must remain vigilant."

Since Friday morning, troops from the IDF's Duvdevan undercover unit, Paratroopers Brigade and Search and Rescue Brigade, along with Border Police forces in the West Bank, have been . The forces are also preparing to expand their operations.

So far, , dozens of roadblocks have been set up across the area and the IDF's elite Maglan unit has been deployed to the Judea Regional Brigade . In addition, work has begun to clear and demolish at the site of the attack.

Police said a situation assessment had been completed under the leadership of Maj. Gen. Moshe Pinchi. Pinchi assigned the investigation to the district's Central Investigations Unit minority affairs division, which will also assist the Shin Bet security agency in investigating the attack.

He also ordered investigators to focus on the use of a "mashtuba" vehicle, an Arabic term referring to a vehicle that has been taken off the road, for example because it was stolen or had become too old for legal use, but continues to be driven illegally.

The attackers used such a vehicle, which had been taken off the road but bore an Israeli license plate.

"This is a phenomenon that must be eradicated," Pinchi said.

District police forces will step up enforcement on roads, including inspections of vehicles and suspects and the seizure of "mashtuba" vehicles.

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

  1. 26 OctNot just Iran: Netanyahu defies IDF chief over continuing Hebron operation8.8
  2. 25 OctIsrael's fate will be decided in the West Bank, not just at the ballot box0.0
  3. 25 OctIsrael fears copycat attacks ahead of election after deadly West Bank terror shooting9.7
  4. 25 OctIsrael fears copycat attacks ahead of election after deadly West Bank terror shooting9.8
  5. 23 OctIDF and Shin Bet launch counterterrorism operation in Hebron ...9.1

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)

See how 240 outlets covered this story