Ynet News (English), on West Bank, 25 October 2026

Ynet tells the Hebron raid and the West Bank lockdown entirely in the Israeli military's words: it calls the two Palestinians killed "terrorists" in its own voice, repeats "terrorist activity" and "terrorist networks" as established fact, and turns the demolition of Palestinian property into "reshape parts of the operational environment". Settler attacks on the olive harvest become "tensions", "friction" and "clashes", and Israeli officials get the last word that only a small percentage of harvest areas were affected. The article never tells its reader that the West Bank is occupied and the settlements illegal, and it leaves out the siege of Hebron, the expulsion of hundreds of residents and the closure of all crossings to Palestinians that other outlets reported on the same days.

9.8

Severe

out of 10

What we found

  1. Labels people on one side's word

    Severe

    “the two terrorists exchanged fire”

    What the words do
    Repeats the label in the outlet's voice in the one sentence describing newly released footage, so the label is carried by the apparently neutral description of evidence.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the footage shows "terrorists", a verdict confirmed by the video.
    What is actually the case
    The footage shows an exchange of fire; the characterisation of the men comes from the military, whose account the next sentence explicitly attributes.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“According to the military's account”

    Show it in the article

    “deadly West Bank terror shooting”

    What the words do
    Puts the verdict in the headline, in the outlet's own voice and with no source.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the classification of the shooting is uncontested fact before reading a word of the body.
    What is actually the case
    Coverage of the same event describes two Palestinians who opened fire on Israeli troops at a checkpoint and were shot dead; the "terror" classification is the Israeli government's and army's.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli troops sealed the homes of the two Palestinians who, the military says, shot dead two soldiers at a checkpoint near Hebron on Friday and who were themselves shot dead at the scene.

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “suspects involved in terrorist activity”

    What the words do
    States in Ynet's own voice that the people the raids are looking for are involved in terrorist activity.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That those arrested in Hebron are established participants in terrorism.
    What is actually the case
    The article reports only arrests and searches, and says of the one arrest it describes in detail that no weapons were found; the characterisation is the military's own.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“No weapons were found in his possession”

    Show it in the article

    “disrupting terrorist networks”

    What the words do
    Describes the aim of raids outside Hebron as disrupting terrorist networks without attributing it to anyone.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That such networks exist across the West Bank as a matter of fact.
    What is actually the case
    The next sentence shows this is the military's own description of its efforts, and nothing in the article evidences any network.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The military said its efforts are intended”

    Show it in the article

  3. Softens settler violence

    Serious

    “which has been accompanied by tensions and incidents of nationalist violence”

    What the words do
    Describes attacks on Palestinian olive harvesters as "tensions" and as "nationalist violence" with no actor in the sentence.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the harvest has been troubled by a general atmosphere of hostility with no identifiable perpetrator.
    What is actually the case
    The violence against harvesters is carried out by settlers, who operate armed by the Israeli state and accompanied by Israeli occupation forces; the article names no attacker here.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “a source of friction between Palestinian farmers and Israeli settlers”

    What the words do
    Recasts armed settler attacks on farmers reaching their own land as mutual "friction" between two parties.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That farmers and settlers are two sides rubbing against each other over access to land.
    What is actually the case
    The dispossession runs one way: settlers are armed by the Israeli state and accompanied by the army, and the land in question is Palestinian agricultural land in occupied territory.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “reduce the risk of clashes during the harvest”

    What the words do
    Calls what the troops are deployed against "clashes", a word that makes two sides collide.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Palestinian harvesters and settlers both bring violence that soldiers stand between.
    What is actually the case
    The article's own earlier sentences call these events violence and attacks against the harvest, and settlers act with state arms and army escort.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“recent incidents of nationalist violence, including attacks connected to the harvest”
    • On the recordWest Bank settlers operate armed by the Israeli state and accompanied by the Israeli army.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The olive harvest has been hit by settler attacks on Palestinian farmers; the military says it has reinforced the occupied West Bank with extra forces during the season.

  4. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “confrontations had affected only a small percentage of the areas being harvested”

    What the words do
    Closes the harvest section with Israeli defence officials' assessment of how little violence there was, with nothing from the farmers who were attacked.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That settler violence against the harvest is a marginal problem, as measured by the army itself.
    What is actually the case
    The same passage concedes there have been attacks connected to the harvest, and no Palestinian farmer, village council or rights group is quoted anywhere in the article to test the claim.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“accompanied by tensions and incidents of nationalist violence”

    Show it in the article

    “the overwhelming majority of coordinated harvesting activities conducted under security protection had proceeded without unusual incidents”

    What the words do
    Repeats the same officials' reassurance a second time, narrowed to harvesting the army itself coordinated and protected.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the harvest as a whole has gone smoothly.
    What is actually the case
    The claim covers only the roughly 100 locations the army says it protected, not the groves Palestinians could not reach or where they were attacked; the article offers no figure for those.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“coordinated protection at approximately 100 harvesting locations”

    Show it in the article

  5. Euphemism hides the destruction of Palestinian property

    Serious

    “efforts to reshape parts of the operational environment to make it easier for troops to maneuver and identify threats”

    What the words do
    Describes the clearing and destruction of built-up Palestinian areas in Hebron as reshaping an "operational environment".
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the army is adjusting terrain or sightlines, not demolishing anything people live in or use.
    What is actually the case
    The operation in Hebron includes removing structures and, on the same days, Netanyahu said of the neighbourhood the gunmen came from that "We will act to destroy this place" and that the army "will evacuate the residents", with hundreds already expelled.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “the removal of structures the military considers illegal”

    What the words do
    Reports the demolition of Palestinian buildings using only the military's own legal verdict on them and the soft word "removal".
    What a reader comes away believing
    That unlawful structures are simply being cleared away.
    What is actually the case
    Palestinian building permits in the occupied West Bank are almost never granted, which is why structures are deemed illegal; the article gives no owner, no occupant and no permit context.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli occupation forces are also demolishing Palestinian structures in Hebron, which the military says were built illegally, and clearing ground to ease troop movement.

  6. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “a practice authorities defend as a deterrent”

    What the words do
    Ends the paragraph on punitive home demolitions with the Israeli authorities' justification and nothing against it.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the only thing to say about demolishing the families' homes is that officials consider it effective.
    What is actually the case
    Punitive demolition of the homes of relatives who did nothing is collective punishment, and coverage of these same days describes Israel's Hebron measures in exactly those terms; the article carries no such characterisation and no voice from the families.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israel has long demolished the homes of Palestinians who carried out attacks, punishing relatives who are not accused of anything; officials call it a deterrent, while rights groups and other reporting on this operation call it collective punishment.

  7. Hedges the documented record

    Serious

    “connecting several major Palestinian cities and Israeli settlements”

    What the words do
    Places settlements alongside Palestinian cities as ordinary places on a road map, with no legal status attached.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Israeli settlements in the West Bank are simply towns like any other.
    What is actually the case
    The International Court of Justice found in July 2024 that the settlements are illegal under international law and the occupation unlawful; the article never uses the word occupied or any reference to that ruling.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Highway 60 runs through the occupied West Bank, linking Palestinian cities and Israeli settlements that the International Court of Justice has found illegal under international law.

  8. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article describes the Hebron operation only as arrests, searches and confiscations. It never says that Netanyahu ordered a siege of the city of some 250,000 people, said of the gunmen's neighbourhood "We will act to destroy this place" and that the army "will evacuate the residents", or that hundreds of Palestinians have already been expelled from their homes, with the mayor calling Hebron "a disaster zone". Without this a reader believes the operation is a targeted hunt for suspects rather than a city-wide siege and mass expulsion.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  9. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article presents the pre-election measures as arrests, patrols and drills, but omits that all West Bank land crossings are being closed to Palestinians on election day and that Palestinian workers are barred from entering all Israeli settlements from Sunday to Tuesday, cutting off income for tens of thousands. Without this a reader believes the heightened posture falls on suspects, not on the whole Palestinian population.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  10. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article says Israeli forces are conducting raids outside Hebron but never reports what those raids have done: troops shot and wounded at least one Palestinian man in Dura, and Israeli forces closed the Ibrahimi Mosque and expelled its staff and custodians. Without this a reader believes no Palestinian has been hurt or displaced by the operation.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

Israel fears copycat attacks ahead of election after

Security forces have heightened their alert across the West Bank amid fears of copycat attacks following a deadly shooting near Hebron on Friday, stepping up arrests, patrols and counterterrorism operations less than two days before the national election.

The military said Sunday that troops had arrested a suspect believed to be planning an imminent attack on Highway 60, a major highway used daily by Israeli motorists in the West Bank. The arrest came as security forces continued a large-scale operation in Hebron, where approximately 50 suspects have been detained and more than 500 locations searched.

The heightened security measures follow Friday's shooting near the West Bank city, which killed Staff Sgt. Ron Yonatan Roytman and Sgt. Yuval Shai Svilem and left three other soldiers lightly wounded.

Defense officials are particularly concerned that the attack could inspire additional assaults in the days leading up to Tuesday's election, prompting the military to expand its operational presence across the territory.

Alongside the security operations, the IDF launched a major military exercise Sunday involving four divisions and the air force, aimed at strengthening readiness across several regions.

Suspect arrested over alleged imminent attack

In the Binyamin area of the central West Bank, soldiers from the Paratroopers Brigade's 202nd Battalion arrested a suspect believed to be preparing an attack on Highway 60.

The operation followed specific intelligence provided by the Shin Bet domestic security agency.

Acting on the information, troops established a checkpoint along the highway and detained the suspect.

No weapons were found in his possession at the time of the arrest, and he was transferred to security authorities for further questioning.

Highway 60 is one of the West Bank's main north-south highways, . It is heavily traveled by Israeli motorists and has been the site of previous attacks.

The arrest was part of a broader effort to prevent further violence following Friday's shooting.

Security forces have intensified raids, patrols and arrests at several locations across the West Bank, seeking to identify and prevent additional attacks inspired by the Hebron incident.

Homes of two gunmen sealed ahead of demolition

Israeli troops also sealed the homes of the two terrorists responsible for Friday's attack, following an order signed by the head of the military's Central Command authorizing their seizure and temporary closure.

The military intends to proceed with demolishing the properties.

Both gunmen were killed in exchanges of fire with Israeli security forces during the attack.

Israel has long used punitive home demolitions against Palestinians who carried out deadly attacks, .

New footage released Sunday showed the confrontation at Yehuda Junction, near Hebron, where with the command group of the deputy commander of the 755th Battalion.

According to the military's account, command teams from the battalion and paratrooper forces rushed to the scene and engaged the attackers in a gunbattle that ended with both gunmen dead.

The military said the soldiers' response prevented the attackers from reaching a nearby road used by Israeli motorists, potentially averting a more serious attack.

Hebron operation continues with no end date

Israeli forces continued their operation in Hebron overnight, with troops from the Paratroopers Brigade and the elite Maglan commando unit arresting 12 additional suspects.

The troops also confiscated vehicles described by the military as illegal and located weapons.

Since the operation began, approximately 50 suspects have been arrested and security forces have searched more than 500 locations throughout the city.

The military has not announced when the operation will end, saying its duration will depend on ongoing security assessments.

Israeli forces are also maintaining an expanded presence outside Hebron, conducting raids and arrests aimed at and preventing attacks elsewhere in the West Bank.

The military said its efforts are intended both to apprehend suspects involved in terrorist activity and to prevent the establishment of infrastructure that could support future attacks.

With the election approaching, defense officials are particularly concerned about attempts to imitate Friday's shooting or carry out attacks inspired by the incident.

Alongside the raids, the military has instructed soldiers stationed along roads, at intersections, checkpoints and security posts to tighten operational procedures.

The measures are intended to improve the identification of threats in real time, stop attacks before they develop and reduce risks to troops operating in the area.

The Hebron operation also includes and .

Four divisions and air force join major military drill

Meanwhile, a large-scale military exercise began Sunday involving the IDF's West Bank Division, the 98th, 96th and 210th divisions, along with the Israeli Air Force.

The exercise is taking place in areas under the responsibility of the participating regional divisions.

According to the military, the drill was planned as part of the Operations Directorate's 2026 training program and is intended to strengthen operational readiness, rehearse military procedures and incorporate lessons learned from the war.

The military said the exercise also aims to improve the defense of Israeli communities and strengthen coordination with air forces supporting ground operations.

Increased movement of troops, military vehicles and aircraft is expected Sunday and Monday in areas under the military's Central and Northern commands.

The IDF emphasized that the exercise had been scheduled in advance and that the increased military activity was not an indication of a new security incident.

The drill comes amid heightened alert levels ahead of the election, with the military seeking to maintain readiness for threats across several fronts.

Security forces reinforce West Bank olive harvest

The military also provided an update Sunday on security arrangements during the annual olive harvest in the West Bank, .

According to IDF figures, approximately 220,000 dunams, or 54,400 acres, of olive groves have been harvested so far this season.

Security forces have coordinated protection at approximately 100 harvesting locations.

The military estimated that about 22,500 metric tons of olives have been collected, producing approximately 5,500 liters of olive oil.

Despite recent incidents of nationalist violence, including attacks connected to the harvest, Israeli defense officials said .

They maintained that .

To facilitate the harvest and prevent confrontations, violence and attacks, the military has reinforced its Central Command with additional forces.

The reinforcements include the headquarters of the 98th Division, a task force headquarters from the Paratroopers Brigade, a regular infantry battalion and Border Police companies.

The forces have been deployed throughout the West Bank to provide security, prevent attacks and .

The olive harvest is an important source of income for many Palestinian families, and access to agricultural land has frequently been .

The additional deployments come as the military balances several security priorities, including protecting civilians, preventing attacks and maintaining a heightened operational presence before Tuesday's election.

For Israeli security officials, the immediate concern remains the possibility that Friday's deadly shooting could trigger further attacks.

With no announced end date for the Hebron operation and troops continuing arrests and patrols across the West Bank, the military is seeking to prevent another deadly incident during the final days of the election campaign.

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

  1. 26 OctNot just Iran: Netanyahu defies IDF chief over continuing Hebron operation8.8
  2. 26 OctNot just Iran: Netanyahu defies IDF chief over continuing Hebron operation9.4
  3. 25 OctIsrael's fate will be decided in the West Bank, not just at the ballot box0.0
  4. 23 OctIDF and Shin Bet launch counterterrorism operation in Hebron ...9.1
  5. 23 OctHelmet camera footage shows Israeli forces battling terrorists near ...9.4

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)