Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on West Bank, 25 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

IDF: Vast majority of Judea and Samaria olive harvests proceed peacefully

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

Approximately 220,000 dunams of land have been harvested , according to figures released by the IDF, which detailed the security measures being implemented to protect harvesting operations and prevent violence. According to military estimates, the harvest has yielded approximately 22,500 tons of olives, producing an estimated 5,500 liters of olive oil, with a total reported value of NIS 225 million.

The IDF stated that approximately 100 olive harvesting sites have operated in coordination with security forces, which have provided protection for agricultural activities throughout Judea and Samaria. The military emphasized that incidents attracting increased media coverage represent only a small proportion of the areas where harvesting is taking place. According to the IDF, the overwhelming majority of coordinated harvesting activities have proceeded according to plan, without exceptional incidents.

To ensure the harvest can proceed safely and minimize the risk of violence, friction, and terrorist activity, the IDF has reinforced Central Command with additional personnel and units. The reinforcements include the headquarters of the 98th Division, a task force headquarters from the Paratroopers Brigade, a regular battalion, and Border Police companies. The additional forces have been deployed across Judea and Samaria to provide security, prevent confrontations, and conduct counterterrorism operations.

The IDF stressed that security personnel regard violence, criminal offenses, and attempts to undermine security as serious matters, regardless of who is responsible. The military added that its forces will continue operating throughout Judea and Samaria to prevent terrorist attacks, safeguard civilians, and preserve security and stability. The announcement follows several violent incidents and confrontations during this year's olive harvest season in Judea and Samaria.

On October 16, several Israelis were lightly injured during clashes in the Binyamin Region, where , launched fireworks, and set fire to Jewish-owned agricultural land near al-Mughayyir and Abu Falah. The Binyamin Regional Council accused the rioters of exploiting the olive harvest to provoke confrontations with Jewish residents. That same day, Washington Post photographer Heidi Levine was injured during a confrontation near Abu Falah.

The following day, diplomatic representatives from France, Belgium, and Poland while visiting an olive harvest near Taybeh. The IDF condemned the violence, while police opened an investigation. The military also noted that . On October 21, New York congressional candidate Brad Lander and dozens of activists were detained during an olive harvest near Beitar Illit.

The IDF explained that the activity had not received the required advance authorization, which is intended to ensure security and maintain public order. On the same day, Israeli authorities ordered the deportation of two foreign activists in the Hebron Hills. Earlier, during a visit to Central Command on October 14, IDF Chief of Staff LTG Eyal Zamir addressed the security situation surrounding the harvest, stating: "We are currently in the olive harvest season.

"

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

Israel National News relays an Israeli occupation forces statement on the olive harvest largely in the army's terms. It names the occupied West Bank only as "Judea and Samaria", and in its own voice it calls Palestinians "rioters" while the Israelis who attacked diplomats stay "masked Israelis". No Palestinian farmer is heard, and the army chief gets the last word.

  1. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “during the current olive harvest season in Judea and Samaria”

    Why this matters
    The outlet's own opening sentence places the harvest in "Judea and Samaria" before any attribution to the army.
    The impression it gives
    A reader learns the place name as fact from the first line of the story.
    The context
    This is occupied Palestinian land under a regime the ICJ found unlawful, and the farmers harvesting it are Palestinians living under occupation.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli occupation forces say most olive harvesting in the occupied West Bank has gone ahead without major incidents.

  2. Labels people on one side's word

    Serious

    “Palestinian Arab rioters reportedly threw rocks”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls the Palestinians "rioters" in its own voice. It hedges what they did with "reportedly" but not the label.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established that the Palestinians present were rioters who started the violence.
    The context
    The only named source for this account is the Binyamin Regional Council, the settlers' council, which made the accusation. No Palestinian account is given.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The Binyamin Regional Council accused the rioters of exploiting the olive harvest”

    Show it in the article

    “reported being attacked by masked Israelis”

    Why this matters
    Here the outlet does the opposite. Diplomats only "reported" an attack, and the attackers get no label at all, only "masked Israelis".
    The impression it gives
    A reader treats the Palestinian violence as fact and the attack on European diplomats as a claim.
    The context
    The army itself condemned this violence and police opened an investigation. Yet the outlet labels Palestinians and leaves the Israeli attackers unlabelled. The article never uses the word settler.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The IDF condemned the violence”

    Show it in the article

  3. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “detained during an unauthorized olive harvest”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls the harvest "unauthorized" in its own voice, adopting the army's permit framing from the previous sentence.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the harvest as unlawful and the detentions and deportations as a fair response to a breach of the rules.
    The context
    The authorisation comes from the occupying power, whose occupation the ICJ ruled unlawful. The article gives the reader only the army's account of why the permit is needed.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the activity had not received the required advance authorization”
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “Security forces are working together to maintain public order and protect the area.”

    Why this matters
    The outlet states the army's self-description as plain fact, with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader accepts that the forces present are neutral protectors of order.
    The context
    The same article reports diplomats attacked and activists detained during the harvest. The record shows settlers operate armed by the Israeli state and accompanied by its army.

    How we know

    • On the recordWest Bank settlers operate armed by the Israeli state and accompanied by the Israeli army.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“reported being attacked by masked Israelis”

    Show it in the article

  4. Shifts blame onto the attacked

    Minor

    “the diplomats' visit had not been coordinated with security forces”

    Why this matters
    The outlet closes the account of the attack on diplomats with the army's note about the visit's coordination, and nothing follows it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking the diplomats partly brought the attack on themselves.
    The context
    The diplomats were attacked by masked Israelis. Whether they coordinated their visit has no bearing on who attacked them, and the article leaves the attackers unnamed.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“attacked by masked Israelis while visiting”

    Show it in the article

  5. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “The IDF will continue operating to enable the harvest to take place while maintaining public order and ensuring the safety of all populations in the area.”

    Why this matters
    The army chief gets the closing words. Every source in the article is the army, the police or the settlers' council.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears only the occupying army and the settlers about a harvest carried out by Palestinian farmers.
    The context
    No Palestinian farmer, village or rights group is quoted anywhere in the article.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “farmer”.
    • On the recordReporting on Israel's assault on Gaza and on the Greens' Zionism motion has given Israeli, pro-Israel and Israeli-government sources far more space than Palestinian voices, who are quoted least when the story concerns them.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 26 OctThree terror suspects arrested in Judea and Samaria weapons raids9.1
  2. 25 OctSmotrich reveals: Israel gearing up for all-out campaign in Judea and Samaria9.4
  3. 25 OctDramatic footage shows moments troops eliminated Judea Junction terrorists8.0
  4. 25 Oct500 searches, just two guns? Questions raised over IDF Hebron operation9.1
  5. 25 Oct'I'm willing to go to prison': Bereaved father issues ultimatum8.7

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News