The Jerusalem Post, on Lebanon, 23 October 2026

The Jerusalem Post gives one lobbyist an uninterrupted platform and, in its own voice, turns Israel's killing of roughly 3,000 people in Lebanon into "collateral damage" and "tragic losses" with no actor and no figure, while the same article states plainly that Palestinian factions killed "more than 600" in 1976. It writes Israel's invasion and bombardment of Lebanon as a war that merely "touched their own country" after Hezbollah's attacks, calls Hezbollah "Iran-backed" in its own voice, and closes on the claim that the Lebanese government, not Israel, is why people "paid with their lives", with nothing against it.

9.1

Severe

out of 10

What we found

  1. Writes the death out

    Severe

    “the collateral damage that has wreaked havoc across multiple sects in southern Lebanon”

    What the words do
    The Post, in its own voice, sums up Israel's killing in Lebanon as "collateral damage" that "wreaked havoc". No one kills and no one dies in this phrasing.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the harm in southern Lebanon is incidental damage of a war, with no named killer and no scale.
    What is actually the case
    Israel has killed roughly 3,000 people in Lebanon since 2 March 2026 on the Lebanese Health Ministry's count, including hundreds of women and children. The same article states plainly that Palestinian factions killed "more than 600" in 1976, so the Post uses the word killed when the actor is Palestinian and "collateral damage" when the actor is Israel.

    How we know

    • On the recordIsrael has killed roughly 3,000 people in Lebanon since 2 March 2026, according to the Lebanese Health Ministry's count.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordAP's count of the Lebanon dead for that period includes 292 women and 211 children.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“more than 600 were killed”

    Show it in the article

    “the tragic losses”

    What the words do
    In the Post's own narration of Hajjar's answer, the dead of southern Lebanon become "tragic losses", a phrase with no killing and no killer in it.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Lebanese deaths are a misfortune people are too emotional about, rather than people Israeli forces killed.
    What is actually the case
    The Lebanese Health Ministry's count puts the dead at roughly 3,000, with Israeli strikes also destroying more than 40,000 homes and displacing more than a million people. The article never once names Israel as having killed anyone in Lebanon.

    How we know

    • On the recordIsrael has killed roughly 3,000 people in Lebanon since 2 March 2026, according to the Lebanese Health Ministry's count.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordIsraeli strikes have destroyed more than 40,000 homes in Lebanon and displaced more than 1 million people.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“killing dozens of civilians”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Asked about Israel's campaign in Lebanon, which the Lebanese Health Ministry says has killed roughly 3,000 people, Hajjar blamed the Lebanese government.

  2. Hides who did it

    Serious

    “even as the war touched their own country following Hezbollah's attacks a day after the invasion”

    What the words do
    The Post writes Israel's war on Lebanon as something that "touched their own country", with Hezbollah as the only named actor in the chain of events.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Lebanon was brushed by a war Hezbollah started, and that no one in particular did anything to Lebanon.
    What is actually the case
    Israel invaded southern Lebanon and bombarded Beirut and other areas, destroying more than 40,000 homes and displacing more than a million people, and occupies a self-declared zone in the south. None of that appears anywhere in the article.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Hajjar argued many Lebanese could empathise with Israel after 7 October, even after Israel invaded southern Lebanon and bombarded Beirut following Hezbollah's attacks.

  3. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “the Lebanese government will stand up and look out for the interests of the Lebanese, not terrorists and foreigners who don't even hold Lebanese citizenship and are not patriotic Lebanese”

    What the words do
    The Post ends the article on Hajjar's claim, leaving his account that Lebanon's dead are the fault of its own government and of "terrorists and foreigners" as the final word.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That responsibility for the deaths in Lebanon rests with the Lebanese government and armed groups, and that there is nothing to set against this.
    What is actually the case
    Israel killed roughly 3,000 people in Lebanon over the period, against roughly 21 Israelis killed by Hezbollah, and Israel invaded and bombarded Lebanese territory. The article gives no Lebanese government, Hezbollah or southern Lebanese response at any point.

    How we know

    • On the recordIsrael has killed roughly 3,000 people in Lebanon since 2 March 2026, according to the Lebanese Health Ministry's count.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordHezbollah has killed roughly 21 people in Israel over the same period.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“Hajjar blamed the Lebanese government”

    Show it in the article

  4. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “a government unwilling to confront the Iran-backed group”

    What the words do
    The Post attaches "Iran-backed" to Hezbollah in its own voice as a default descriptor rather than attributing it to Hajjar.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Hezbollah is chiefly a foreign instrument rather than a party with a place in Lebanese politics.
    What is actually the case
    The description is the outlet's own standing modifier: it uses the identical phrase for Hezbollah in its earlier reporting. Nothing in the article sources the label to anyone.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “whose son was wounded in a terror attack”

    What the words do
    The Post calls an attack terrorism in its own voice with no source, no date and no detail about the incident.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the Post has established the attack as terrorism as a matter of record.
    What is actually the case
    The article gives no account of the incident at all, so the label rests on nothing a reader can check.

    Show it in the article

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never gives any figure for the dead in Lebanon or names Israel as having killed them, although it does report that "more than 600 were killed" in attacks fifty years ago. A reader comes away with no idea that the Lebanese Health Ministry counts roughly 3,000 dead since March, against roughly 21 Israelis killed by Hezbollah.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  6. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article presents Lebanon's ruin as the work of corruption and Hezbollah alone, never mentioning that Israeli strikes destroyed more than 40,000 homes and displaced over a million people, or that Israel occupies a zone in the south. Without this a reader believes the "infrastructure in shambles" has nothing to do with Israel.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

Lebanese people want Israel ties, stronger government to oust Hezbollah, AMCD head says

The Lebanese people want “full diplomatic ties” with Israel and to enjoy the benefits of tourism and trade with their neighboring state, but are being held captive by both Hezbollah and , President of the American Mideast Coalition for Democracy John Hajjar told The Jerusalem Post on Thursday night.Hajjar, who visited Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, and Haifa several years ago, said he grew up hearing stories from his Lebanese grandparents about Jewish holidaymakers who would visit the Lebanese mountains for rest and relaxation when his grandmother was young. He said Israel and Lebanon had much to offer each other's citizens, arguing that the misapplication of Lebanon's 1955 anti-boycott law had created unnecessary barriers to engagement between the neighboring countries.The law was originally intended to prevent trade and financial dealings with Israel as part of the Arab League's efforts to economically isolate the Jewish state, but has since been used to prevent even the most basic forms of communication, benefiting Hezbollah and Hamas, Hajjar said.When the boycott law was first introduced, Article 7 stipulated that violations could be punished with three to 10 years of temporary hard labor, alongside financial fines, asset seizures, and product confiscation. However, Hajjar said, members of the Lebanese diaspora have since faced sentences of up to 15 years in absentia simply for expressing the view that Lebanon would benefit from pursuing peace with its neighbor.More recently, there were efforts to have Lebanon's Ambassador to Washington, Nada Hamadeh Moawad, prosecuted over her message of support to Israeli Ambassador to the US Yechiel Leiter, .The Lebanese people demand peace“The Lebanese people demand peace. They want to grow their economy. The infrastructure in Lebanon is in shambles. Lebanon is still a beautiful place, and a lot of economic activity still goes on, but it could be so much better if there were strong ties with Israel,” Hajjar argued. “... It would be mutually beneficial for both Lebanese and Israelis if peace is established.”Earlier this week, Hajjar and his co-chair, Tom Harb, wrote an open letter urging Washington to use its influence with Lebanon to push for the repeal of the boycott law, which would allow religious groups in Lebanon to finally visit the many holy sites in Jerusalem. They also called on the US to sanction members of the Lebanese judiciary involved in prosecuting violations of the law.“You see it in poll after poll among the Lebanese. They're trying to break the wall of silence imposed by Hezbollah and other terrorist organizations, and by their proxies in the Lebanese government. But I believe that day is fast approaching when people will finally break free and say, 'That's it. We're not going to tolerate these laws that forbid us from speaking with Israelis, and we want full diplomatic ties.” he continued.Nostalgic for the years Lebanon was the “Paris of the Middle East,” Hajjar shared it had been disheartening to see a country he feels so connected with struggle to bear the weight of sectarian violence, terrorism and wars.He argued that, given Lebanon's own experience with Palestinian terrorism, many Lebanese could empathize with Israel following the October 7 attacks .“I think the Lebanese diaspora in the United States understands the persecution of minorities, and they feel a natural affinity to the State of Israel and what Israelis have endured, because the Lebanese themselves have endured the same things in Lebanon for hundreds of years,” he said. “The horrible terrorist acts of October 7 were happening to the Lebanese in 1976 in Damour and Aishi, another Christian village, which was savagely attacked by the Palestinians. The same methods were used on October 7 in Israel, and I think a lot of Lebanese understand the suffering and feel a natural affinity for Israeli citizens because of what they are going through.”Palestinian armed groups, including Fatah and other PLO-aligned factions, attacked the predominantly Christian town of Damour in January 1976, killing hundreds of people and forcing its inhabitants to flee. In October that year, Palestinian factions, including Fatah and As-Sa'iqa, attacked the southern Christian village of Aishiyeh, killing dozens of civilians and displacing its population. Palestinian refugees displaced from the Tal al-Zaatar camp were later resettled in Damour, while Aishiyeh was used as a PLO base. In total, more than 600 were killed in both attacks.Asked how to deal with Hezbollah, particularly as AMCD advocates sanctions that critics argue could push Beirut closer to Tehran, Hajjar said Lebanon's government needed to be refreshed if it could not end the “double game” of promising to disarm Hezbollah while turning a blind eye to it.Hajjar calls for stronger government capable of getting rid of HezbollahSofter in his stance for Lebanon's Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, Hajjar didn't mince his words on the corruption in Beirut. He argued Nabih Beri has grown rich while pushing the boycott laws that deny opportunity to Lebanon's struggling economy“It's time for him to go, and if President Aoun and Prime Minister Salem can't get Hezbollah disarmed, then it's time for them to go,” he insisted.Hajjar said that while the Lebanese people were often seen as eternally patient with a government unable to fulfill its promises, as demonstrated by the lack of justice over the Beirut port explosion and now the arms laws, that patience was waning, as was their willingness to remain “captive by Hezbollah.”“Hezbollah has, despite its claims to the contrary, carried out wave after wave of assassinations against prominent Lebanese officials. It has infiltrated every segment of the government and civil society. It has operatives throughout the country, even in Druze and Christian areas, and the Lebanese have strong reasons to be very fearful. They also lack strong political leaders, and that is a direct result of the fact that those who have been outspoken and principled have paid with their lives,” he said, acknowledging how hard it has been for the Lebanese to push for any kind of change.Asked about the war with Israel and , Hajjar blamed the Lebanese government, saying that some people were too emotionally affected by to understand its responsibility.“Some people have paid with their lives, unfortunately, because the Lebanese government is really a failed state. When you don't have a government that can protect its people and is strong enough to negotiate peace, the consequences can be very disastrous, and that's what has happened,” he shared. “I understand why Israel is conducting this war against Hezbollah, and I just wish the Lebanese government would realize that they have a common enemy in Hezbollah and other terrorist groups, including Palestinian groups that are still armed in the camps and Hamas, to the extent that it has any operations in Lebanon.”“When all those terrorist organizations are defeated and held accountable, and their leaders are held accountable, either paying the ultimate price or serving long prison terms, maybe for life, then you're going to have more of this,” Hajjar concluded. “Hopefully, justice will be served, and .”

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 26 OctHezbollah readies for new regional war with funds from Iran, sources say9.4
  2. 24 OctAre Lebanese Shi'ites abandoning Hezbollah? Poll shows majority favor disarming group - analysis8.7
  3. 22 OctDefense Ministry sanctions UK registered company after transfer of fuel to Hezbollah-owned company7.3
  4. 22 OctHezbollah recruiting convicts in Latin America for revenue, relaxing ideological requirements7.3
  5. 22 OctHezbollah rebuilding military capabilities in Beirut as IDF prepares for possible renewed fighting8.2

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post