The Jerusalem Post, on Lebanon, 26 October 2026

The Jerusalem Post runs the Reuters report on Hezbollah's rearming but rewrites the passage on what Israel did: where Reuters says the Israeli offensive "killed more than 4,000 people and uprooted a quarter of Lebanon's population", the Post says only that people were "evacuated", and where Reuters says Israel continues "deadly strikes in the south", the Post says Israel strikes "Hezbollah terrorists". It also deletes Hezbollah's actual answer to Reuters about Israel's occupation of Lebanese land and adds, in its own voice, that Israeli troops occupy southern Lebanon "as part of efforts to combat Hezbollah".

9.4

Severe

out of 10

What we found

  1. Writes the death out

    Severe

    “triggering an Israeli response that led to a large number of individuals, mostly members of Hezbollah's Shi'ite Muslim constituency, being evacuated from areas in southern Lebanon”

    What the words do
    The Post describes the consequence of Israel's campaign as people "being evacuated", with no actor and no deaths. The words "a large number of individuals" and "evacuated" replace the wire's figures for the killed and the uprooted.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Israel's answer to Hezbollah's 2 March attack amounted to moving people out of southern Lebanon, with no mass killing and no destruction of homes.
    What is actually the case
    The same Reuters copy that the Post is reprinting says the Israeli offensive killed more than 4,000 people and uprooted a quarter of Lebanon's population. The documented record puts the Lebanese dead at roughly 3,000 on the Health Ministry's count, with more than 40,000 homes destroyed and more than a million people displaced.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “an Israeli response”

    What the words do
    Calls Israel's offensive a "response" in the paper's own voice, a word of justification, where the wire calls it an offensive.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That what followed was a proportionate reaction rather than a campaign that killed thousands.
    What is actually the case
    Reuters' own wording is "an Israeli offensive that killed more than 4,000 people"; the record puts roughly 3,000 Lebanese dead against roughly 21 Israeli dead.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Hezbollah attacked Israel in support of Iran on 2 March, triggering an Israeli offensive that killed more than 4,000 people in Lebanon and drove a quarter of the population from their homes, most of them from Hezbollah's Shia constituency in the south.

  2. Labels people on one side's word

    Severe

    “Israel continues strikes on Hezbollah terrorists in the south”

    What the words do
    The Post states in its own voice that the people Israel keeps striking are "Hezbollah terrorists", and drops the word the wire used for those strikes.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That everyone Israel is still killing in southern Lebanon is a Hezbollah fighter, and that the continuing strikes are not lethal to anyone else.
    What is actually the case
    The Reuters copy the Post is reprinting says only "Israel continues deadly strikes in the south", with no claim about who is hit. The Post offers nothing in the article to support the label, and it removes "deadly".

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Full-scale hostilities have not resumed in Lebanon despite the collapse of the US-Iranian deal, though Israel continues deadly strikes in the south.

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    “rejected the suggestion that its command-and-control systems had been broken down”

    What the words do
    The Post reports only the narrow part of Hezbollah's reply to Reuters and deletes the rest of what its media office said.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Hezbollah's only answer to Reuters was a denial about its command structures.
    What is actually the case
    Reuters and Al-Monitor both report that in response to the same questions Hezbollah's media office said Israel's occupation of Lebanese land made any resistance to it a legitimate right. Ynet carries both halves. The Post keeps the denial and removes the argument about the occupation.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Hezbollah's media office rejected the suggestion that its command-and-control systems had broken down, and said Israel's occupation of Lebanese land made any resistance to it a legitimate right.

  4. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “As part of efforts to combat Hezbollah, IDF troops now occupy a security zone in southern Lebanon”

    What the words do
    The Post adds a purpose clause that is not in the wire copy, stating in its own voice why Israeli forces hold Lebanese territory.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the occupation of southern Lebanon is an agreed counter-Hezbollah measure rather than a contested occupation of another country's land.
    What is actually the case
    The zone is one Israel declared for itself in southern Lebanon. Reuters' version of this report carries no such justification, and Hezbollah's reply to Reuters, which the Post cut, called it an occupation of Lebanese land.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli troops occupy a self-declared security zone in southern Lebanon, and political pressure has built up in Beirut for Hezbollah's disarmament.

  5. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Lebanese terrorist group Hezbollah”

    What the words do
    Replaces the wire's neutral description with a verdict in the paper's own voice in the article's first words.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That "terrorist group" is the established description rather than one party's designation.
    What is actually the case
    Reuters and Al-Monitor both open the same report with "Lebanese armed group Hezbollah". The Post gives no attribution for the label.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “the terror group”

    What the words do
    Repeats the verdict as the paper's standing name for Hezbollah while reporting a money transfer, where the wire simply says "the group".
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the label is a neutral shorthand the reporting has established.
    What is actually the case
    Nothing in the article supports the label; it is the Post's substitution for Reuters' wording throughout.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

Hezbollah readies for new regional war with funds from Iran, sources say

has spent three months preparing for a possible resumption of hostilities with Israel, after receiving an infusion of cash from Iran, according to Lebanese security personnel briefed on its activities.The group, founded by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) in 1982, has been dealt severe blows in two wars with Israel since 2024, with thousands of fighters and many of its leaders killed, and much of its arsenal destroyed., and political pressure has built up in Beirut for its disarmament.It nevertheless remains committed to attacking Israel and has used a lull in hostilities since June to rearm, with a focus on procuring explosives and producing drones that can be flown into the security zone, two Lebanese security sources told Reuters.One of the sources, and another close to Hezbollah, said the group had received tens of millions of dollars from Iran to help boost its military capabilities. That is in addition to around $200 million that previously received from Tehran, which Reuters reported earlier this month.The group has been restoring command-and-control structures that broke down in key battles, according to one of those sources and three other security officials familiar with the group's operations.In response to questions from Reuters, Hezbollah's media office .Israel's military declined to comment. Iran's permanent mission to the United Nations in Geneva did not immediately respond to Reuters questions.A US State Department spokesman said Washington would keep strangling Hezbollah's finances through sanctions and other measures. A US Treasury spokesperson said Iran was running out of money and ways to move money.Hezbollah on alert for potential of renewed fightingHezbollah's effort comes amid continued tensions in the wider Middle Eastern conflict ignited by the US-Israeli war with Iran that began in February.Hezbollah attacked Israel in support of Iran on March 2, .Hostilities largely abated over the summer as an interim Iran-US deal included a Lebanon ceasefire and Washington-mediated talks between Lebanon and Israel. Full-scale hostilities have not resumed in Lebanon despite the collapse of the US-Iranian deal, though .Hezbollah is on alert for a possible US-Iran escalation, potentially reigniting the Lebanon front.The sources told Reuters the terror group had not yet managed to fully prepare its stockpiles or fighting force.Hezbollah is still restocking, acknowledging this month that explosives seized by Lebanese authorities belonged to it and were intended for use against Israel. A ⁠Hezbollah official and a Lebanese security source told Reuters they were specifically ​for its explosive drones.Hezbollah struggled to fight IDFThe terror group will also need to repair command-and-control capabilities after losses on key fronts, including the flashpoint town of Bint Jbeil and the strategic Ali al-Taher ridge, according to one of the Lebanese sources and three security officials.They said Hezbollah's tactic of operating in small units and rationing the use of anti-tank rockets left some units isolated on those fronts, struggling to confront Israel's remotely operated systems, including weaponized drones and armed remote-controlled vehicles.The Israeli military told Reuters it uses remotely-operated systems to monitor southern Lebanon and reduce troops' threat exposure.Hezbollah has not explicitly said whether it would take part in the eruption of fresh hostilities, but its media office said it was wary of giving Israeli leaders any justification to escalate anti-Hezbollah efforts.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 24 OctAre Lebanese Shi'ites abandoning Hezbollah? Poll shows majority favor disarming group - analysis8.7
  2. 23 Oct Lebanese people want Israel ties, stronger government to oust Hezbollah, AMCD head says9.1
  3. 22 OctDefense Ministry sanctions UK registered company after transfer of fuel to Hezbollah-owned company7.3
  4. 22 OctHezbollah recruiting convicts in Latin America for revenue, relaxing ideological requirements7.3
  5. 22 OctHezbollah rebuilding military capabilities in Beirut as IDF prepares for possible renewed fighting8.2

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post