Ynet News (English), on Gaza, 5 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

: Meet the newly elected judges at The Hague and their ties to Israel

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

The UN General Assembly and Security Council elected five judges to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague on Tuesday: Dapo Akande of the United Kingdom, François Alabrune of France, Mahmoud Daifallah Hmoud of Jordan, Phoebe Okowa of Kenya and Rena Lee of Singapore. Their nine-year terms will begin in 2027 and end in 2036. Israel's ambassador to the UN, Danny Danon, expressed concern over the election of some of the judges, citing their previous involvement in proceedings against Israel.

Mahmoud Daifallah Hmoud: A sitting judge at the International Court of Justice since May 2025 and a former Jordanian ambassador to the UN. He previously served as legal adviser to Jordan's Foreign Ministry and as a member of the UN International Law Commission, which he chaired in 2021. He took an adversarial position toward Israel on Jordan's behalf in proceedings before the International Court of Justice, including the 2004 advisory opinion on Israel's West Bank separation barrier and .

On October 30, 2023, less than a month after the October 7 terrorist attack, Hmoud accused Israel of "ethnic cleansing" and "war crimes" during a UN Security Council meeting. Dapo Akande: A professor of international law at the University of Oxford and a member of the UN International Law Commission (ILC). Throughout his career, he has represented and advised countries in international legal proceedings, including before the International Court of Justice.

Among other roles, he served as legal counsel for Japan in . François Alabrune: A senior diplomat and legal expert who serves as France's ambassador to the Netherlands and its permanent representative to the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. He previously served as legal adviser to the French Foreign Ministry and represented France in proceedings before international courts.

Among other cases, he served as France's legal representative in proceedings involving the Genocide Convention, including cases brought by Ukraine against Russia and The Gambia against Myanmar. Rena Lee: Singapore's ambassador for international law, with experience in maritime law, international arbitration and multilateral negotiations. From 2018 to 2023, she chaired the UN conference that negotiated the international agreement on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction.

She previously served as chief executive of the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and as a senior legal adviser in the country's Attorney-General's Chambers. Phoebe N. Okowa: A sitting judge at the International Court of Justice since November 2025, who has now been elected to a full nine-year term. She is a professor of international law at Queen Mary University of London and previously served as a member of the UN International Law Commission.

Throughout her career, she has represented and advised countries in proceedings before the International Court of Justice. Among other roles, she served as legal counsel for Namibia in proceedings that led to . She has also worked on international legal proceedings involving climate change and human rights.

Danny Danon, Israel's ambassador to the UN, criticized the election of the judges: "Their résumés are troubling and raise questions. Will a judge who, a month after the October 7 massacre, be able to handle the case against it impartially? Will a judge who served as legal counsel in a case against us administer justice professionally and without bias? The election in the General Assembly is yet another example of the UN's inherent bias against the State of Israel."

The International Court of Justice, based in The Hague, is the principal judicial organ of the UN. It is authorized to hear legal disputes between states and issue advisory opinions on questions of international law referred to it by authorized UN bodies. The court consists of 15 judges, elected to nine-year terms through separate votes in the UN General Assembly and Security Council. In December 2023, South Africa initiated proceedings against Israel at the ICJ, alleging violations of the Genocide Convention in the Gaza Strip.

The court issued provisional measures in 2024, and the case remains ongoing.

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Ynet profiles the five judges newly elected to the ICJ through Israel's objections. It lets Danny Danon say a judge 'wrongly declared' genocide, when its own reporting shows Hmoud spoke of ethnic cleansing and war crimes, and the UN Commission of Inquiry has since found genocide. Three times it names the 2024 advisory opinion as a mark against the judges but never says the court held the occupation unlawful.

  1. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “wrongly declared that Israel was committing genocide”

    Why this matters
    Ynet carries Danon's charge that a judge 'wrongly declared' genocide and sets nothing against it. The passage then moves to neutral background about the court.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Hmoud declared genocide in October 2023, and that any such declaration has been shown to be wrong.
    The context
    Ynet's own account of Hmoud's October 2023 remarks quotes him on ethnic cleansing and war crimes, not genocide. The UN Commission of Inquiry found in September 2025 that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza, and the ICJ has issued provisional measures in the genocide case.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Hmoud accused Israel of "ethnic cleansing" and "war crimes"”
    • On the recordThe UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found, on 16 September 2025, that Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip.ohchr.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice has issued provisional measures in the genocide case against Israel; this is a documented finding, not an allegation awaiting a reporter's verdict.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Danon said one judge had 'wrongly declared' that Israel was committing genocide. Hmoud's reported remarks spoke of ethnic cleansing and war crimes, and a UN Commission of Inquiry found in September 2025 that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza.

  2. Hedges the documented record

    Minor

    “the 2024 advisory opinion on the legal consequences of Israeli policies and practices in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem”

    Why this matters
    Ynet lists Hmoud's part in the 2024 advisory opinion as evidence of an adversarial stance toward Israel, but names the opinion only by its subject.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes this as a hostile case brought against Israel with no settled outcome.
    The context
    The ICJ held in that opinion that Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem is unlawful and the settlements are illegal. The article never says so.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe ICJ's July 2024 advisory opinion holds Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful and the settlements illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “occupation”, “unlawful”, “illegal” and “settlements”.

    Show it in the article

    “proceedings concerning the legal consequences of Israeli activities in the West Bank”

    Why this matters
    Ynet goes further here and calls the subject of the case 'Israeli activities', a neutral word for what the court addressed.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Akande's work concerned ordinary state conduct, so acting for Japan in it is a sign of bias.
    The context
    The proceedings concerned Israel's occupation, which the court found unlawful, along with the settlements. That finding is the documented record, and it is missing.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe ICJ's July 2024 advisory opinion holds Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful and the settlements illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “the court's 2024 advisory opinion on the legal consequences of Israeli policies and practices in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem”

    Why this matters
    For Okowa, Ynet again names the opinion by title alone as a strike against her, in a piece headlined on 'ties to Israel'.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes her role for Namibia was simply taking a side against Israel.
    The context
    The court she argued before ruled the occupation unlawful and the settlements illegal. The article leaves out what the court itself decided.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe ICJ's July 2024 advisory opinion holds Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful and the settlements illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

  3. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “‘Troubling résumés’”

    Why this matters
    Ynet opens the headline with Danon's verdict in quotation marks and gives no name.
    The impression it gives
    A reader meets the judges already labelled as troubling, and may not know whose view that is.
    The context
    The words are a close paraphrase of a criticism made only by Israel's UN ambassador. The article quotes no other voice on the judges.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Their résumés are troubling and raise questions”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

  1. 4 NovOctober 7: New details reveal five red-hot Hamas warnings Israel missed0.0
  2. 2 Nov'Inside, I was still at war': Nova survivor's descent into addiction and road to recovery0.0
  3. 2 NovTrump's Gaza plan stalls as Israel's political deadlock deepens8.7
  4. 2 NovTrump's Gaza plan stalls as Israel's political deadlock deepens8.7
  5. 1 NovFormer IDF chief: Israel misread Hamas, prioritized Iran before Oct. 7 attack3.0

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)