The Guardian, on West Bank, 23 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Netanyahu orders ‘very extensive’ operation in West Bank after two Israeli soldiers killed

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

Benjamin Netanyahu has ordered the army to prepare for a “very extensive” operation in the occupied West Bank after two Israeli soldiers and near a checkpoint in Hebron. The Israeli prime minister said the military would go house to house and demolish homes, in an operation on a scale unseen in the occupied West Bank for decades, after the Israeli military said it had thwarted a “terror attack” by two armed Palestinians on Friday.

Tensions are high before next week’s election. at a temporary checkpoint outside Hebron after failing to reach a nearby highway, where the Israeli military believes they had intended to attack civilians. According to a preliminary military investigation, the ensuing gunfight lasted more than 20 minutes, leaving five Israelis wounded, two of whom later died from their injuries.

An AFP photographer who was on the way to another assignment and witnessed the gun battle saw two Palestinian men armed with a handgun and an automatic rifle exchanging fire with Israeli forces. Netanyahu’s office later said it had instructed security forces to immediately cordon off Hebron and prepare for a full closure of the West Bank starting on Friday. After the shooting, Netanyahu held an emergency meeting of his security cabinet and officials from top military and security agencies.

He said Hamas was “planning a major attack aimed at murdering innocent civilians”. During a visit to Hebron after the attack, Netanyahu later said Israeli forces would enter the neighbourhood of the attackers and displace its residents. He said the military would apply a model previously used in refugee camps in the northern West Bank. A large-scale military operation named the “Iron Wall” launched in January 2025 and forcibly displaced tens of thousands of people from several refugee camps, according to the UN rights office.

“We will evacuate the residents, we will go from house to house, we will also seize the weapons there, and all the terrorist infrastructure will be dealt with and destroyed,” Netanyahu said, according to his office. Closures of the West Bank are becoming more common. Friday’s lockdown was the fourth time in the past month that Israel had imposed restrictions across the territory, shutting gates and checkpoints connecting Palestinian villages to major roads, which will remain open to Israeli drivers, including settlers, who can still travel through the area.

Bezalel Smotrich, the far-right Israeli finance minister who also holds a position within the defence ministry, called for a military campaign in the West Bank “exactly like in Gaza”. He said: “There is no other option but a comprehensive military campaign to dismantle the Palestinian Authority, collect weapons and eliminate terrorists. Exactly like in Gaza and Lebanon.” Smotrich added: “In the next government this will be one of the first measures that we must demand and apply.”

Human rights groups said Netanyahu and his government might use the attack on Israeli soldiers to try to justify tougher measures against Palestinians and bolster their security credentials before the election. Israeli forces overwhelmed by violent settlers in ‘terrorist attack’ on Palestinian family Read more “Every day in the West Bank is a dramatic day for the Palestinians,” Yariv Oppenheimer, the former director of Peace Now told Al Jazeera.

“The Israeli army is getting into the Palestinian cities, the settlers are attacking Palestinians, and the situation is impossible. “There will be house demolitions. We will see [a] curfew. We will see more soldiers … making arrests, and definitely we might see the settlers trying to target Palestinians in revenge for this attack, and trying to take advantage of this situation in order to escalate the situation even more.” Voters go to the polls on Tuesday in an election that will help to determine whether Netanyahu secures another term as prime minister.

The vote comes three years after the Hamas-led attacks on Israel that . Israeli settlers are increasingly taking over Palestinian properties, and . The campaign has intensified amid . More than 1,100 Palestinians have been killed there by Israeli forces or settlers, whose violence has surged during the annual olive harvest.

Last Friday settlers attacked Palestinian villages, burning cars and trees and injuring a Washington Post photographer . The next day they attacked European diplomats, a French mayor and Palestinian olive pickers, injuring three people and damaging a diplomatic vehicle. Prominent Israelis, including a candidate for the far-right Amcha Yisrael party, shared conspiracy theories groundlessly accusing the AFP photographer of links to the gunmen, after he documented the Hebron attack.

The Foreign Press Association (FPA) said it was deeply alarmed by claims the photographer had been tipped off, describing them as “dangerous and defamatory”. “He is a longtime professional who was on his way to another assignment and courageously documented what he saw in keeping with his professional duties,” the FPA said in a statement. The incident came a week after settlers severely injured the photographer Heidi Levine as she documented attacks on Palestinians attempting to harvest olives in the occupied West Bank.

Israel has also denied entry to several European journalists and an academic. Explore more on these topics West Bank Israel Palestine Benjamin Netanyahu Middle East and north Africa news Share Reuse this content

Read the original article on theguardian.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

The Guardian reports Netanyahu's order for a large West Bank operation after a Hebron gunfight and names settlers and Israeli forces as the killers of Palestinians elsewhere. It reports home demolitions as a matter of missing permits without the context that makes those permits nearly unobtainable, and it twice calls Gaza a war without the documented finding of genocide, even as it reports Smotrich demanding a campaign "exactly like in Gaza". The account of the Hebron shooting comes almost wholly from Israeli officials, and no Palestinian is heard.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    “authorities have stepped up demolitions of homes lacking building permits, displacing families”

    Why this matters
    The Guardian gives "lacking building permits" as the reason for the demolitions. It calls the demolishers only "authorities".
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes these families built without bothering to get permission, and that a neutral planning body enforced ordinary rules.
    The context
    The demolishers are Israeli occupation authorities. In Area C, which is under Israeli military control, Palestinians are almost never granted building permits. The article never says this, and it never names Area C.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Hedges the documented record

    Minor

    “triggered the war in Gaza”

    Why this matters
    The Guardian calls Israel's assault on Gaza "the war in Gaza" in its own voice. It reports Smotrich demanding a West Bank campaign "exactly like in Gaza" and never says what was done there.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Gaza to be an ordinary war. Smotrich's demand then reads as a call for a tough military campaign, not for a repeat of a documented genocide.
    The context
    The UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza. The article reports Smotrich's demand without that record, though the story turns on it.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found, on 16 September 2025, that Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“Exactly like in Gaza and Lebanon.”

    Show it in the article

    “since the war in Gaza started in October 2023”

    Why this matters
    The second use of "the war in Gaza" frames West Bank land seizures as a side effect of a war.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the surge in West Bank dispossession to be wartime spillover between two sides.
    The context
    Other coverage of this event places the West Bank escalation inside Israel's genocidal war on Gaza. The Guardian names neither the genocide nor the ICJ's provisional measures.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Hedges the documented record

    Minor

    “accelerating land seizures and settlement expansion across the occupied West Bank”

    Why this matters
    The Guardian reports "settlement expansion" and settlers "taking over Palestinian properties". It never says that the settlements are illegal or that the occupation is unlawful.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes settlement growth to be a policy choice, not a breach of international law.
    The context
    The ICJ found the settlements illegal and the occupation unlawful. Other reporting of this same Hebron event states that the settlements in Hebron are illegal.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. Hides who did it

    Minor

    “two Palestinians were killed in an exchange of fire”

    Why this matters
    The Guardian writes that the two Palestinians "were killed" in a passive sentence. It never says that Israeli forces shot them, and it never gives their names.
    The impression it gives
    A reader knows they died in a gunfight but is never told plainly who killed them or who they were.
    The context
    Other outlets reported that Israeli army fire killed them, and Palestinian media named them as Mohammad Jaaba and Firas Jaaba, both 27, from Hebron.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  5. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “According to the Israel Defense Forces, the two assailants opened fire on soldiers”

    Why this matters
    The Guardian builds its account of the shooting on the IOF, a "preliminary military investigation" and Netanyahu's office. It then gives long quotes to Netanyahu and Smotrich.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears the event, and the plan to empty a Hebron neighbourhood, only through the Israeli government and army.
    The context
    No Palestinian is quoted anywhere in the article. That includes the Hebron residents Netanyahu said would be displaced, whom the article describes only in his words.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“enter the neighbourhood of the attackers and displace its residents”
    • On the recordReporting on Israel's assault on Gaza and on the Greens' Zionism motion has given Israeli, pro-Israel and Israeli-government sources far more space than Palestinian voices, who are quoted least when the story concerns them.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Guardian

  1. 26 OctBritish politicians among international delegates barred from entering West Bank0.0
  2. 24 OctIsraeli soldiers raze neighbourhood in Hebron, driving families from homes6.0
  3. 22 OctFirst Thing: Israel using US-made electroshock weapons on Palestinian detainees3.0
  4. 21 OctHeidi Levine recounts how Palestinian youths helped save her in settler attack3.0
  5. 21 OctFifth foreign firm pulls out of controversial Israeli cable car project to East Jerusalem0.0

Everything we scored from The Guardian

See how 240 outlets covered this story