Press TV, on Iran, 31 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Iran

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has warned that there will be no more red lines if Iran comes under another round of US-Israeli aggression, saying the country’s powerful armed forces will inflict a devastating blow on anyone who dares to attack the Iranian nation. In a post on X on Saturday, Araghchi was responding to recent remarks by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz about the possibility of renewed US attacks on Iran and the economic costs of the conflict for Europe.

“When Israel-US bombings of Iran began last year, Mr. Merz hailed them. ‘Doing Europe’s dirty work,’” Araghchi wrote, invoking the German chancellor’s remarks during the first round of US-Israeli war of aggression on Iran last year. He added that the more than 100 billion euros in economic costs is “nothing compared to the Earth-shattering blow Iran’s Powerful Armed Forces will deal against those who dare harm our people.” “Red lines are a thing of the past,” the Iranian foreign minister further warned.

When Israel-US bombings of Iran began last year, Mr. Merz hailed them. — Seyed Abbas Araghchi (@araghchi) October 31, 2026 "Doing Europe's dirty work" 100bn Euro is nothing compared to the Earth-shattering blow Iran's Powerful Armed Forces will deal against those who dare harm our people. Red lines are a thing of the past. https://t.co/HIclTatGiO Araghchi was referring to Merz’s remarks on Friday, when the German chancellor, speaking at the end of his visit to South Korea, said the war could not be resolved through military means and urged all parties to pursue a diplomatic solution.

Speaking to reporters, Merz said Germany was coordinating and stepping up diplomatic efforts to bring the war to an end. “Businesses and consumers in Europe have paid more than 100 billion euros extra because energy has become more expensive as a result of this conflict,” he said. “We therefore also have an economic interest in bringing this conflict to an end as quickly as possible.” Merz also appealed for dialogue, saying, “This conflict cannot be resolved militarily.”

The US and waged their first against Iran, which lasted 12 days, in June 2025. Their second aggression began on February 28, 2026, and came to a halt in early April after 40 days. In both wars, . Iran has also maintained a tight grip on the Strait of Hormuz since the early days of . In July, the US conducted waves of deadly air raids on Iran and imposed a naval blockade of the country , signed on June 17, to end the war.

In response, the Iranian Armed Forces launched across West Asia and declared the Strait of Hormuz closed to all traffic.

Read the original article on presstv.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Press TV reports Araghchi's warning to Merz accurately and quotes Merz at length. In its own voice, though, it states Iran's contested claims as fact: that the US blockade violated the Islamabad memorandum and that Iranian operations forced the attackers into a ceasefire. It also narrates the background in loaded verdict words such as 'the Israeli regime', 'criminal war' and 'imposed war'.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “in violation of the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Islamic Republic”

    Why this matters
    Press TV states in its own voice that the US naval blockade broke the Islamabad memorandum. It gives no source for this judgement.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes it as settled fact that the US breached the June 17 deal.
    The context
    Whether the blockade breached the memorandum is Iran's position. The article attributes it to no one and gives no US account or text of the agreement to test it against.

    Show it in the article

    “Iran’s resistance and successful retaliatory operations forced the aggressors to accept a ceasefire”

    Why this matters
    Press TV asserts as its own fact why both wars ended: that Iranian operations forced the US and Israel to accept a ceasefire.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes it is established that Iran compelled both ceasefires.
    The context
    This is one side's account of how and why the fighting stopped. The article offers no source or evidence for the causal claim, and attributes it to no one.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “claimed”.

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “the Israeli regime”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls the Israeli government 'the Israeli regime' in its own narration.
    The impression it gives
    The reader receives a verdict on the Israeli state's legitimacy as plain description.
    The context
    'Regime' is a loaded term when it appears unattributed in narration. 'Israel' or 'the Israeli government' says the same thing without the verdict.

    Show it in the article

    “criminal war”

    Why this matters
    Press TV labels the June 2025 war 'criminal' in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes a legal verdict on the war as established fact.
    The context
    The article cites no court or legal finding that calls this war criminal. The word is the outlet's own judgement.

    Show it in the article

    “the second imposed war”

    Why this matters
    Press TV uses 'imposed war', a term from Iranian official language, as neutral narration.
    The impression it gives
    The reader absorbs the Iranian state's description of the war as the plain name for it.
    The context
    The phrase is a political characterisation, not a neutral description, and the article does not mark it as anyone's term.

    Show it in the article

    “devastating strikes against strategic American targets”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls the Iranian strikes 'devastating' and their targets 'strategic' in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes the Iranian strikes caused great damage to important US targets.
    The context
    The article gives no detail on what was hit or what damage resulted. The adjectives carry a verdict the reported facts do not support.

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 31 OctIran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman denounces Canada’s ‘absurd’ endorsement of UAE claims over Iranian trio islands7.3
  2. 30 OctThree offending tankers catch fire in Strait of Hormuz after defying Iranian warnings: IRGC6.0
  3. 29 OctIRGC Navy captures, lands US spy drone intact in Strait of Hormuz7.3
  4. 29 OctFormer US president Obama warns war on Iran has left US ‘more vulnerable’ as Tehran holds Hormuz ‘veto power’3.0
  5. 29 OctIRGC Navy captures, lands US spy drone intact in Strait of Hormuz6.0

Everything we scored from Press TV