Daily Express, on UK Politics, 6 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

on flashing lights to warn other drivers

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Police show exactly where they stand on flashing lights to warn other drivers The Highway Code, police and even the courts are clear where they stand on drivers who flash their headlights to warn others of a speed camera up ahead. Share Article Share Article Facebook X LinkedIn Reddit Bluesky Email Copy Link Link copied Add us as preferred source Comments By Steffan Rhys 06:29, Fri, Nov 6, 2026 Police have shown clearly how they view people flashing their headlights to warn other drivers (Image: Getty) Chances are you've found yourself in a situation where an approaching driver has suddenly flashed their headlights at you.

Instinctively, you understand what it means: there is most likely a speed camera, van or some other police presence just ahead. You might feel your fellow motorist has done you a favour by issuing the warning. In reality, they have placed themselves at risk of prosecution and a fine of £1,000. This is no theoretical risk either — drivers have genuinely faced prosecution for flashing their lights to alert others, reports Wales Online . Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT What does the Highway Code say about flashing lights?

Get motoring news and advice plus selected offers and competitions I would like to receive emails from the Daily Express featuring our latest products, services, offers, and promotions from across the Reach Plc family . Subscribe Invalid email You agree you are 18 or over. We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you.

You can unsubscribe at any time. More Info . Highway Code Rule 110 states: "Only flash your headlights to let other road users know that you are there. Do not flash your headlights to convey any other message or intimidate other road users." Notably, Rule 112 of the Highway Code also cautions that your horn should be used "only while your vehicle is moving and you need to warn other road users of your presence" and adds: "Never sound your horn aggressively."

Is there a law against flashing your headlights? There is no specific criminal offence of "flashing headlights to warn others". However, police in England and Wales would prosecute this under Section 89 of the Police Act 1996 , which makes it an offence to "wilfully obstruct a constable in the execution of his duty." Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT Because officers are actively trying to catch speeding motorists, .

The maximum penalty for this offence is one month's imprisonment or a £1,000 fine. In accordance with sentencing guidelines, punishments can vary from a fine and a custodial sentence through to a conditional discharge or community order. Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT It is worth noting that police treat this matter very seriously. A prime example of this emerged, perhaps surprisingly, in the weekly newsletter of a local primary school earlier in 2026.

The school cautioned that "several people are warning other motorists" about the presence of a Cheshire Police speed van that had recently been deployed to monitor traffic speeds outside the school. The school noted that officers were warning that this behaviour breached both Highway Code Rule 110 and Section 89 of the Police Act 1996, and that they "could charge anyone who appears to be obstructing their ability to conduct speed checks on other motorists by warning them", adding: "The maximum fine for obstructing a police officer is a penalty of £1,000."

Furthermore, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), in its official guidance on Public Justice Offences, lists "giving a warning to other motorists of a police speed trap ahead" as an example of conduct that would constitute resisting or wilfully obstructing a constable in the execution of their duty. Trending The court case: DPP v Glendinning In this 2005 case, a lorry driver was observed flashing his headlights at oncoming motorists after noticing a speed camera van on a dual carriageway.

Officers witnessed this behaviour, concluded he was deliberately alerting other drivers, and charged him with obstructing police. A lorry driver was taken to court for flashing drivers in what police said was a warning to other drivers of a speed camera in the road ahead (Image: Getty) The driver was initially found guilty, however the conviction was subsequently overturned at the High Court, where judges ruled that concrete evidence of actual obstruction was required, rather than merely the potential for it to occur.

In this particular instance, the High Court determined there was no proof that approaching vehicles were exceeding the speed limit, that motorists had altered their behaviour in response to being flashed, or that police enforcement operations had been genuinely disrupted. Nevertheless, this prosecution makes it abundantly clear that police are prepared to take motorists to court for flashing their headlights to alert others to speed cameras ahead.

Driving laws Motoring fines Crime Share Article Share Article Facebook X LinkedIn Reddit Bluesky Email Copy Link Link copied Add us as preferred source Comments

Read the original article on express.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Express gives drivers broadly accurate guidance on flashing headlights at speed cameras, but it states in its own voice that any warning counts as obstruction before reporting a High Court ruling that says actual obstruction must be proved. Its headline says police have shown exactly where they stand, when the body offers only one Cheshire Police warning, passed on through a school newsletter.

  1. Overstates the law

    Minor

    “warning drivers so they temporarily slow down is legally interpreted as interfering with police duties”

    Why this matters
    The sentence states as settled law, in the outlet's own voice, that warning drivers is interfering with police duties.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it that any headlight warning is in itself the offence of obstruction.
    The context
    The article's own account of DPP v Glendinning says the High Court required concrete evidence of actual obstruction, not just the potential for it. On that basis it overturned the conviction.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“judges ruled that concrete evidence of actual obstruction was required, rather than merely the potential for it to occur”
    • Elsewhere in the article“there was no proof that approaching vehicles were exceeding the speed limit”

    Show it in the article

  2. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “Police show exactly where they stand”

    Why this matters
    The headline says police have set out a clear, general position.
    The impression it gives
    A reader expects a statement from police forces on flashing headlights.
    The context
    The only current police view in the body is one Cheshire Police warning, reported second hand through a primary school newsletter. The rest is CPS guidance and a 2005 court case.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“in the weekly newsletter of a local primary school”
    • Elsewhere in the article“a Cheshire Police speed van”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “There is no specific criminal offence of "flashing headlights to warn others".”

    It tells readers plainly that no specific offence exists before explaining which law police rely on.

  • “the conviction was subsequently overturned at the High Court”

    It reports that the prosecution failed, rather than leaving readers to assume the driver was convicted.

  • “the High Court determined there was no proof that approaching vehicles were exceeding the speed limit”

    It sets out the specific grounds on which the court overturned the conviction.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Express

  1. 6 NovAndy Burnham under fire as new Abu Dhabi files revealed: 'Come clean!'3.0
  2. 6 NovAndy Burnham warned over slavery apology - 'he'll be asked for money next'6.0
  3. 6 NovAndy Burnham’s £140 car tax rule change - starts in April 20276.0
  4. 6 NovAmbulance crew and police ‘attacked with fireworks’ during shocking Bonfire Night violence3.0
  5. 6 NovTerrified mum shares conscription fears for young son on BBC Question Time3.0

Everything we scored from Daily Express