Federal Officials Indict 15 Minnesotans Over Anti-ICE Conspiracy In St. Paul
Image: The Intercept

Federal Officials Indict 15 Minnesotans Over Anti-ICE Conspiracy In St. Paul

17 June, 2026.Protests.6 sources

15 Minnesotans charged by DOJ with conspiring to impede or injure federal ICE agents. Several defendants face additional charges such as threats, violence, stalking, or destruction of government property.

6 outlets3 divides3 facts unevenly coveredseverity 6/10

Beat 1 · The verdict

América Tevé frames far-left orchestration as proven, while The Intercept questions the evidence access.

Read them yourself

Do not take our word for it. Here is what they published.

Full story

Indictments spark protests

Federal officials said a grand jury indicted 15 Minnesotans “for conspiracy to impede or injure federal officers,” and for efforts to allegedly “violently oppose immigration law enforcement” during the surge of federal immigration officers in the state earlier this year.

Federal officials on Tuesday said a grand jury indicted 15 Minnesotans

MPR NewsMPR News

Daniel Rosen, the U.S. attorney for Minnesota, told reporters the 15 were “charged not for what they said but what they did,” as people responded to the charges by protesting outside the federal courthouse in St. Paul.

Image from América TeVé
América TeVéAmérica TeVé

MPR News reported that U.S. marshals sprayed pepper spray and released aerosol grenades after protesters tried to hold open a door.

The monthslong surge of federal immigration agents into Minnesota — at its peak some 3,000 agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agencies flooded the region — had gripped the state and the nation over the winter, setting the backdrop for the Tuesday indictments.

SourcesMPR NewsMPR News

Signal, arrests, and claims

Prosecutors said the 15 people charged conspired to impede federal immigration agents during Operation Metro Surge, and Sahan Journal reported that Rosen said the actions of the 15 went beyond peaceful protest and constitutionally protected free speech.

Rosen said, “These defendants are not being charged for what they said, but what they did,” and Sahan Journal reported that the indictment alleged members of a group called Direct Action Minnesota tried to block ICE agents’ movement to and from the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building near the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport on Jan. 23 and March 1.

Image from MPR News
MPR NewsMPR News

Sahan Journal also reported that Dozens of protesters rallied outside the federal courthouse building in Minneapolis on Tuesday morning and called the arrests a “naked political attack” by President Donald Trump over resistance to his administration’s immigration enforcement operation in Minnesota.

The Daily Chronicle said prosecutors showed photos of protesters blocking streets and creating barricades near the Whipple Federal Building, and it reported that Daniel Rosen and Michael McCarthy announced the charges at a press conference Tuesday.

Legal fights and access

The Intercept described how anti-ICE activists relied on Signal for secure communications in Minneapolis, and it said the indictment is built upon “more than a dozen Signal groups” and “more than 100 specific messages.”

more than 100 specific messages

The InterceptThe Intercept

It also raised the question of how Homeland Security Investigations gained access, noting that the indictment “doesn’t provide a clear answer,” while pointing to clues suggesting law enforcement may have accessed physical devices of some of those indicted.

RTBF focused on the legality of publishing agent identities, saying ICE List is hosted in the Netherlands and that “There is no direct criminal jurisdiction by American courts over a site hosted in the Netherlands.”

In response to the legal debate, RTBF quoted lawyer Carine Doutrelepont saying “The GDPR does not necessarily trump freedom of expression,” while warning that publication remains punishable if content is manifestly illegal, defamatory, false, or directly endangers people.